314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34173051)
21. Comparison of diagnostic methods for early interproximal caries detection with near-infrared light transillumination: an in vivo study.
Baltacioglu IH; Orhan K
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):130. PubMed ID: 29145846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of healthcare policy and education on reading accuracy of bitewing radiographs for interproximal caries.
Sato H; Da Silva JD; Lee C; Yonemoto H; Kuwajima Y; Ohyama H; Lambert RF; Izumisawa M; Takahashi N; Nagai S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Feb; 50(2):20200153. PubMed ID: 32795199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Caries and Restoration Detection Using Bitewing Film Based on Transfer Learning with CNNs.
Mao YC; Chen TY; Chou HS; Lin SY; Liu SY; Chen YA; Liu YL; Chen CA; Huang YC; Chen SL; Li CW; Abu PAR; Chiang WY
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(13):. PubMed ID: 34283167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of radiographic and clinical diagnosis of approximal and occlusal dental caries in a young adult population.
Hopcraft MS; Morgan MV
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 15853844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 2. Evaluation of the size of approximal lesions and need for treatment.
Weiss EI; Tzohar A; Kaffe I; Littner MM; Gelernter I; Eli I
J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):385-8. PubMed ID: 8990681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of approximal caries in 5-year-old Swedish children.
Anderson M; Stecksén-Blicks C; Stenlund H; Ranggård L; Tsilingaridis G; Mejàre I
Caries Res; 2005; 39(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 15741720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 1. Evaluation of the presence of approximal lesions.
Eli I; Weiss EI; Tzohar A; Littner MM; Gelernter I; Kaffe I
J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 8990680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of experience and training on the diagnosis of approximal coronal caries from bitewing radiographs. A Swiss-American comparison.
Firestone AR; Lussi A; Weems RA; Heaven TJ
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 8042021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A deep learning approach to dental restoration classification from bitewing and periapical radiographs.
Karatas O; Cakir NN; Ozsariyildiz SS; Kis HC; Demirbuga S; Gurgan CA
Quintessence Int; 2021 Jun; 52(7):568-574. PubMed ID: 33880914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Context Aware Convolutional Neural Network for Children Caries Diagnosis on Dental Panoramic Radiographs.
Zhou X; Yu G; Yin Q; Liu Y; Zhang Z; Sun J
Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():6029245. PubMed ID: 36188109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of smartphones and tablets in radiographic evaluation: accuracy of caries detection on bitewing radiographs.
Melo CA; Santos MAL; Menezes LS; Santana FS; Melo MFB; Takeshita WM
Gen Dent; 2021; 69(4):28-34. PubMed ID: 34185665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of bitewing radiography on estimates of dental caries experience among children differs according to their disease experience.
Foster Page LA; Boyd D; Fuge K; Stevenson A; Goad K; Sim D; Thomson WM
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):137. PubMed ID: 30092796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Occlusal caries diagnosis in molar teeth from bitewing and panoramic radiographs.
Thomas MF; Ricketts DN; Wilson RF
Prim Dent Care; 2001 Apr; 8(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 11405049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.
Kallio-Pulkkinen S; Huumonen S; Haapea M; Liukkonen E; Sipola A; Tervonen O; Nieminen MT
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150129. PubMed ID: 26234536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs.
Shokri A; Kasraei S; Shokri E; Farhadian M; Hekmat B
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of accuracy cone-beam computed tomography and digital bitewing radiography for detection of recurrent caries under various restorative materials: in vitro study.
Talachi F; Abesi F; Ezoji F; Mahjoub S; Ghorbani H; Bijani A
Oral Radiol; 2023 Oct; 39(4):722-730. PubMed ID: 37335388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of diagnosis of early stage interproximal caries with bitewing radiographs and periapical images using consensus reference.
Takahashi N; Lee C; Da Silva JD; Ohyama H; Roppongi M; Kihara H; Hatakeyama W; Ishikawa-Nagai S; Izumisawa M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20170450. PubMed ID: 30222021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Classification of caries in third molars on panoramic radiographs using deep learning.
Vinayahalingam S; Kempers S; Limon L; Deibel D; Maal T; Hanisch M; Bergé S; Xi T
Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):12609. PubMed ID: 34131266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital transillumination in caries detection versus radiographic and clinical methods: an in-vivo study.
Lara-Capi C; Cagetti MG; Lingström P; Lai G; Cocco F; Simark-Mattsson C; Campus G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Apr; 46(4):20160417. PubMed ID: 28191797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Caries increment and prediction from 12 to 18 years of age: a follow-up study.
David J; Raadal M; Wang NJ; Strand GV
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2006 Mar; 7(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 17140525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
