These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34173457)

  • 1. The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case-study of New York's Citi Bike.
    Teixeira JF; Lopes M
    Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect; 2020 Jul; 6():100166. PubMed ID: 34173457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of bike sharing during the coronavirus pandemic: An analysis of the mobility patterns and perceptions of Lisbon's
    Filipe Teixeira J; Silva C; Moura E Sá F
    Transp Res Part A Policy Pract; 2022 May; 159():17-34. PubMed ID: 35308089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The motivations for using bike sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Lisbon.
    Teixeira JF; Silva C; Moura E Sá F
    Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav; 2021 Oct; 82():378-399. PubMed ID: 34602849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A long-term perspective on the COVID-19: The bike sharing system resilience under the epidemic environment.
    Bi H; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Zhu H
    J Transp Health; 2022 Sep; 26():101460. PubMed ID: 35812803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining the causal relationship between bike-share and public transit in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Kim M; Cho GH
    Cities; 2022 Dec; 131():104024. PubMed ID: 36211221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bikeshare and subway ridership changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City.
    Wang H; Noland RB
    Transp Policy (Oxf); 2021 Jun; 106():262-270. PubMed ID: 34975237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The strengths and weaknesses of bike sharing as an alternative mode during disruptive public health crisis: A qualitative analysis on the users' motivations during COVID-19.
    Teixeira JF; Silva C; Moura E Sá F
    Transp Policy (Oxf); 2022 Dec; 129():24-37. PubMed ID: 36246048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impacts of COVID-19 on bike-sharing usages in Seoul, South Korea.
    Jiao J; Lee HK; Choi SJ
    Cities; 2022 Nov; 130():103849. PubMed ID: 35991508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of COVID-19 on female and male bike sharing users: Insights from Lisbon's
    Teixeira JF; Cunha I
    Cities; 2023 Jan; 132():104058. PubMed ID: 36312519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should bike-sharing continue operating during the COVID-19 pandemic? Empirical findings from Nanjing, China.
    Hua M; Chen X; Cheng L; Chen J
    J Transp Health; 2021 Dec; 23():101264. PubMed ID: 34603960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolvement patterns of usage in a medium-sized bike-sharing system during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Qin Y; Karimi HA
    Sustain Cities Soc; 2023 Sep; 96():104669. PubMed ID: 37265511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining factors affecting public bike ridership and its spatial change before and after COVID-19.
    Kim J; Lee S
    Travel Behav Soc; 2023 Apr; 31():24-36. PubMed ID: 36405768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urban human mobility - A multiscale geospatial network analysis using New York bike-sharing data.
    Xin R; Ai T; Ding L; Zhu R; Meng L
    Cities; 2022 Jul; 126():103677. PubMed ID: 35345426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of spatiotemporal mobility of shared-bike usage during COVID-19 pandemic in Beijing.
    Chai X; Guo X; Xiao J; Jiang J
    Trans GIS; 2021 Dec; 25(6):2866-2887. PubMed ID: 34899032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short- and long-term effects of COVID-19 on bicycle sharing usage.
    Berezvai Z
    Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect; 2022 Sep; 15():100674. PubMed ID: 36034682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who changed and who maintained their urban bike-sharing mobility after the COVID-19 outbreak? A within-subjects study.
    Seifert R; Pellicer-Chenoll M; Antón-González L; Pans M; Devís-Devís J; González LM
    Cities; 2023 Jun; 137():104343. PubMed ID: 37125007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Riding the wave: Predicting the use of the bike-sharing system in Barcelona before and during COVID-19.
    Bustamante X; Federo R; Fernández-I-Marin X
    Sustain Cities Soc; 2022 Aug; 83():103929. PubMed ID: 35535208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bike share responses to COVID-19.
    Jobe J; Griffin GP
    Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect; 2021 Jun; 10():100353. PubMed ID: 36844003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-Stationary Time Series Model for Station-Based Subway Ridership During COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Study of New York City.
    Moghimi B; Kamga C; Safikhani A; Mudigonda S; Vicuna P
    Transp Res Rec; 2023 Apr; 2677(4):463-477. PubMed ID: 37153164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. COVID-19 as a window of opportunity for cycling: Evidence from the first wave.
    Büchel B; Marra AD; Corman F
    Transp Policy (Oxf); 2022 Feb; 116():144-156. PubMed ID: 36570515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.