230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34173946)
1. Will the public pay for green products? Based on analysis of the influencing factors for Chinese's public willingness to pay a price premium for green products.
Yang M; Chen H; Long R; Wang Y; Hou C; Liu B
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Nov; 28(43):61408-61422. PubMed ID: 34173946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influencing Factors and Group Differences of Urban Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Low-Carbon Agricultural Products in China.
Geng N; Liu Z; Han X; Zhang X
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Leveraging carbon label to achieve low-carbon economy: Evidence from a survey in Chinese first-tier cities.
Xu M; Lin B
J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 286():112201. PubMed ID: 33636627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling the significance of celebrity endorsement and consumer interest on attitude, purchase intention, and willingness to pay a premium price for green skincare products.
Al Mamun A; Naznen F; Yang Q; Ali MH; Hashim NMHN
Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16765. PubMed ID: 37292299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study on the Influencing Factors and Willingness to Pay of Consumers Purchasing Ecological Agricultural Products.
Hao H; Yin S; Yu H; Liu Z; Liu Z
J Environ Public Health; 2022; 2022():8469996. PubMed ID: 36133166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors Forming the Consumers' Willingness to Pay a Price Premium for Ecological Goods in Ukraine.
Kucher A; Hełdak M; Kucher L; Raszka B
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 30857268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer trust and willingness to pay for establishing a market-based animal welfare assurance scheme for broiler chickens.
Heinola K; Latvala T; Niemi JK
Poult Sci; 2023 Jul; 102(7):102765. PubMed ID: 37247584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Rice from Remediated Soil: Potential from the Public in Sustainable Soil Pollution Treatment.
Wang HH; Yang J; Hao N
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35897316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Residential open space and the perception of health benefits: How much is the public willing to pay?
Luo W; Chen C; Li H; Hou Y; Xia Y; Liu J; Wu L; Yao J
J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 316():115273. PubMed ID: 35576707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heterogeneous public preferences for controlling agricultural non-point source pollution based on a choice experiment.
Li XP; Cai J; Wang QJ; Wang XW
J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 305():114413. PubMed ID: 34991025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain.
de-Magistris T; Lopéz-Galán B
Public Health; 2016 Jun; 135():83-90. PubMed ID: 26996310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How different advertising appeals (green vs. non-green) impact consumers' willingness to pay a premium for green agricultural products.
Zheng M; Tang D; Chen J; Zheng Q; Xu A
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():991525. PubMed ID: 36211938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of consumers' willingness to pay for sustainable food products.
Li S; Kallas Z
Appetite; 2021 Aug; 163():105239. PubMed ID: 33794258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptions of ecosystem services, disservices and willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation.
Tian Y; Wu H; Zhang G; Wang L; Zheng D; Li S
J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():110140. PubMed ID: 32090834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What are the key factors influencing consumers' preference and willingness to pay for meat products in Eastern DRC?
Udomkun P; Ilukor J; Mockshell J; Mujawamariya G; Okafor C; Bullock R; Nabahungu NL; Vanlauwe B
Food Sci Nutr; 2018 Nov; 6(8):2321-2336. PubMed ID: 30510732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing the willingness to pay a price premium for red meat with potential to improve consumer wellness in Australia and the United States of America.
Zhang R; Kallas Z; Conner TS; Loeffen MPF; Lee M; Day L; Farouk MM; Realini CE
Meat Sci; 2024 Jul; 213():109495. PubMed ID: 38513600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Haze Attitudes and the Willingness to Pay for Haze Improvement: Evidence from Four Cities in Shandong Province, China.
Yang F; Ding L; Liu C; Xu L; Nicholas S; Wang J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30347677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should Waste Separation Be Mandatory? A Study on Public's Response to the Policies in China.
Hou J; Jin Y; Chen F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32599737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Public Willingness to Pay for Green Lifestyle in China: A Contingent Valuation Method Based on Integrated Model.
Geng J; Yang N; Zhang W; Yang L
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
