128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34173973)
1. Lung cancer screening by single-shot dual-energy subtraction using flat-panel detector.
Mogami H; Onoike Y; Miyano H; Arakawa K; Inoue H; Sakae K; Kawakami T
Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):1168-1173. PubMed ID: 34173973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small lung cancers: improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging--comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Li F; Engelmann R; Pesce LL; Doi K; Metz CE; Macmahon H
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):937-49. PubMed ID: 21946054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Uemura M; Miyagawa M; Yasuhara Y; Murakami T; Ikura H; Sakamoto K; Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Mochizuki T
Radiat Med; 2005 Sep; 23(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study.
Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Yamashita Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 28(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 20437132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: initial evaluations in human clinical cases.
Gomi T; Nozaki M; Takeda T; Umeda T; Takahashi K; Nakajima M
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1357-63. PubMed ID: 24119347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detectability of lung nodules using flat panel detector with dual energy subtraction by two shot method: evaluation by ROC method.
Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Yoshimoto M; Mochizuki T; Murase K
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 17386991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: efficacy of dual-energy subtraction technique using flat-panel detector chest radiography.
Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Nakaura T; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nomori H; Yamashita Y
Clin Radiol; 2010 Aug; 65(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 20599062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual energy subtraction digital radiography improves performance of a next generation computer-aided detection program.
Balkman JD; Mehandru S; DuPont E; Novak RD; Gilkeson RC
J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20160602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of lung cancer using single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Ide K; Mogami H; Murakami T; Yasuhara Y; Miyagawa M; Mochizuki T
Radiat Med; 2007 Jun; 25(5):195-201. PubMed ID: 17581707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved detection of small lung cancers with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Li F; Engelmann R; Doi K; MacMahon H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):886-91. PubMed ID: 18356433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical evaluation of single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: with FCR 9501 ES].
Takashima T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Nov; 56(13):909-16. PubMed ID: 8969053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of digital tomosynthesis and dual energy subtraction digital radiography in detecting pulmonary nodules.
Kumar SG; Garg MK; Khandelwal N; Gupta P; Gupta D; Aggarwal AN; Bansal SC
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1383-91. PubMed ID: 25892052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study.
Gomi T; Nakajima M; Fujiwara H; Umeda T
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21232683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of improvement of the detection of interstitial lung diseases by using the dual-energy subtraction radiography method of a flat-panel detector system].
Kiguchi M; Kitagawa Y; Fujioka C; Ishifuro M; Yamaguchi T; Ikeda T; Furukawa T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Dec; 63(12):1362-9. PubMed ID: 18310996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative kinetic analysis of lung nodules using the temporal subtraction technique in dynamic chest radiographies performed with a flat panel detector.
Tsuchiya Y; Kodera Y; Tanaka R; Sanada S
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Apr; 22(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 18415648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Schick A; Cullmann JL; Ebner L; Megyeri B; Vock P; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1006-13. PubMed ID: 23617482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual energy subtraction and temporal subtraction chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Li F; Engelmann R; Roberts R; Armato S
J Thorac Imaging; 2008 May; 23(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 18520564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities.
Fischbach F; Freund T; Röttgen R; Engert U; Felix R; Ricke J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1519-24. PubMed ID: 14627567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical usefulness of temporal subtraction method in screening digital chest radiography with a mobile computed radiography system.
Sasaki Y; Abe K; Tabei M; Katsuragawa S; Kurosaki A; Matsuoka S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jan; 4(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 21170689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
