122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34174092)
1. Assessment of the impact of CT calibration procedures for proton therapy planning on pediatric treatments.
Bär E; Collins-Fekete CA; Rompokos V; Zhang Y; Gaze MN; Warry A; Poynter A; Royle G
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5202-5218. PubMed ID: 34174092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental comparison of photon versus particle computed tomography to predict tissue relative stopping powers.
Bär E; Volz L; Collins-Fekete CA; Brons S; Runz A; Schulte RW; Seco J
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):474-487. PubMed ID: 34709667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The potential of dual-energy CT to reduce proton beam range uncertainties.
Bär E; Lalonde A; Royle G; Lu HM; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2332-2344. PubMed ID: 28295434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo proton dose calculations using a radiotherapy specific dual-energy CT scanner for tissue segmentation and range assessment.
Almeida IP; Schyns LEJR; Vaniqui A; van der Heyden B; Dedes G; Resch AF; Kamp F; Zindler JD; Parodi K; Landry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115008. PubMed ID: 29616662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of beam-hardening corrections on proton relative stopping power estimates from single- and dual-energy CT.
Chacko MS; Wu D; Grewal HS; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13711. PubMed ID: 35816460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of proton stopping power estimation of silicone breast implants with single and dual-energy CT calibration techniques.
Chacko MS; Grewal HS; Wu D; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 22(9):159-170. PubMed ID: 34275175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical density estimations of single- and dual-energy CT using material-based forward projection algorithm: a simulation study.
Li KW; Fujiwara D; Haga A; Liu H; Geng LS
Br J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 94(1128):20201236. PubMed ID: 34541866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental validation of two dual-energy CT methods for proton therapy using heterogeneous tissue samples.
Bär E; Lalonde A; Zhang R; Jee KW; Yang K; Sharp G; Liu B; Royle G; Bouchard H; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 29134674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison study between single- and dual-energy CT density extraction methods for neurological proton monte carlo treatment planning.
van der Heyden B; Almeida IP; Vilches-Freixas G; Van Beveren C; Vaniqui A; Ares C; Terhaag K; Fonseca GP; Eekers DBP; Verhaegen F
Acta Oncol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 31646923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT.
Taasti VT; Petersen JB; Muren LP; Thygesen J; Hansen DC
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5547. PubMed ID: 27782721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stopping-power ratio estimation for proton radiotherapy using dual-energy computed tomography and prior-image constrained denoising.
Zimmerman J; Thor D; Poludniowski G
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 36322128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of relative proton stopping power measurements across patient size using dual- and single-energy CT.
Michalak G; Taasti V; Krauss B; Deisher A; Halaweish A; McCollough C
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1465-1471. PubMed ID: 28885130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric Comparison between Single-energy Computed Tomography and Dual-energy Computed Tomography Relative to Stopping Power Estimation in Proton Therapy.
Chirdchid T; Ruangchan S; Sanghangthum T
J Med Phys; 2023; 48(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 37969143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards subpercentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: Direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method.
Medrano M; Liu R; Zhao T; Webb T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; Liao R; Ge T; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 35029302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of proton stopping power ratios using dual-energy CT basis material decomposition.
Pettersson E; Thilander-Klang A; Bäck A
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):881-897. PubMed ID: 38194501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy.
Hünemohr N; Paganetti H; Greilich S; Jäkel O; Seco J
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061714. PubMed ID: 24877809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of proton stopping power ratio estimation based on dual energy CT using fresh tissue samples.
Taasti VT; Michalak GJ; Hansen DC; Deisher AJ; Kruse JJ; Krauss B; Muren LP; Petersen JBB; McCollough CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015012. PubMed ID: 29057753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculation in proton therapy using dual energy CT.
Lalonde A; Xie Y; Burgdorf B; O'Reilly S; Ingram WS; Yin L; Zou W; Dong L; Bouchard H; Teo BK
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125024. PubMed ID: 31044743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
