These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Corrigendum to "The Mini-OAKHQOL for knee and hip osteoarthritis quality of life was obtained following recent shortening guidelines" [J Clin Epidemiol 2016;69:70-78]. Guillemin F; Rat AC; Goetz C; Spitz E; Pouchot J; Coste J J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():240-241. PubMed ID: 29110786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Corrigendum to "Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis" [J Clin Epidemiol 2018;93:36-44]. Brignardello-Petersen R; Bonner A; Alexander PE; Siemieniuk RA; Furukawa TA; Rochwerg B; Hazlewood GS; Alhazzani W; Mustafa RA; Murad MH; Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH; J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():162. PubMed ID: 29784130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Corrigendum to "Studies reporting ROC curves of diagnostic and prediction data were incorporated into meta-analyses using corresponding odds ratios" [J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 May;60(5):530-4]. Walter SD; Sinuff T J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():147. PubMed ID: 30902350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Corrigendum to Rounding, but not randomization method, non-normality, or correlation, affected baseline P-value distributions in randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;110:50-62. Bolland MJ; Gamble GD; Avenell A; Grey A J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():226. PubMed ID: 32505379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains. Zhang Y; Coello PA; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Xie F; Schünemann HJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():83-93. PubMed ID: 29800687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Schünemann HJ; Mustafa RA; Brozek J; Steingart KR; Leeflang M; Murad MH; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Jaeschke R; Lange S; Meerpohl J; Langendam M; Hultcrantz M; Vist GE; Akl EA; Helfand M; Santesso N; Hooft L; Scholten R; Rosen M; Rutjes A; Crowther M; Muti P; Raatz H; Ansari MT; Williams J; Kunz R; Harris J; Rodriguez IA; Kohli M; Guyatt GH; J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():142-152. PubMed ID: 32058069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [GRADE guidelines 20: Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences - inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains]. Rissling O; Kaiser L; Schulz S; Langer G; Schwingshackl L Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2021 Aug; 164():79-89. PubMed ID: 34253480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research gap of guidelines might be an important approach to prioritization (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:341-6). Wang Q; Wang X; Chen Y; Yang K J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():251-2. PubMed ID: 26073901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision? Schünemann HJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():6-15. PubMed ID: 27063205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence: imprecision]. Kulig M; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):677-88. PubMed ID: 23200212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE. Anttila S; Persson J; Vareman N; Sahlin NE J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():1-5. PubMed ID: 27063204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables]. Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Perleth M; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann H Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(5):357-68. PubMed ID: 22818160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to evaluate the evidence from animal and human studies: the case of teriparatide (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:698-702). Wei D; Chen Y; Yang K J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():252-3. PubMed ID: 26318827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (confidence in the estimates of effect)]. Meerpohl JJ; Langer G; Perleth M; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann H Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):449-56. PubMed ID: 22857733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]