These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34174958)

  • 1. Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Vali Y; Leeflang MMG; Bossuyt PMM
    Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 10(1):191. PubMed ID: 34174958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews.
    Di Girolamo N; Winter A; Meursinge Reynders R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():73-78. PubMed ID: 29777798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Risk on bias assessment: (6) A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment on Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2)].
    Qu YJ; Yang ZR; Sun F; Zhan SY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 39(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 29699051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of bias assessment of test comparisons was uncommon in comparative accuracy systematic reviews: an overview of reviews.
    Yang B; Vali Y; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; Harris IM; Beese S; Davenport C; Hyde C; Takwoingi Y; Whiting P; Langendam MW; Leeflang MMG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():167-174. PubMed ID: 32798714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and N-Terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) as Diagnostic Tests in Adults With Suspected Heart Failure: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2021; 21(2):1-125. PubMed ID: 34055110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Whiting P; Rutjes AW; Dinnes J; Reitsma J; Bossuyt PM; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(25):iii, 1-234. PubMed ID: 15193208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological quality of test accuracy studies included in systematic reviews in obstetrics and gynaecology: sources of bias.
    Morris RK; Selman TJ; Zamora J; Khan KS
    BMC Womens Health; 2011 Mar; 11():7. PubMed ID: 21426545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study.
    Ochodo EA; van Enst WA; Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; Hooft L; Moons KG; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Mar; 14():33. PubMed ID: 24588874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.
    Hennessy EA; Tanner-Smith EE; Finch AJ; Sathe N; Kugley S
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-86. PubMed ID: 37131375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing bias in trials from reactions to measurement: the MERIT study including developmental work and expert workshop.
    French DP; Miles LM; Elbourne D; Farmer A; Gulliford M; Locock L; Sutton S; McCambridge J;
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Sep; 25(55):1-72. PubMed ID: 34553685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
    Struyf T; Deeks JJ; Dinnes J; Takwoingi Y; Davenport C; Leeflang MM; Spijker R; Hooft L; Emperador D; Domen J; Horn SRA; Van den Bruel A;
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Feb; 2(2):CD013665. PubMed ID: 33620086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Placental growth factor (alone or in combination with soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1) as an aid to the assessment of women with suspected pre-eclampsia: systematic review and economic analysis.
    Frampton GK; Jones J; Rose M; Payne L
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Nov; 20(87):1-160. PubMed ID: 27918253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
    Yang B; Mallett S; Takwoingi Y; Davenport CF; Hyde CJ; Whiting PF; Deeks JJ; Leeflang MMG; ; Bossuyt PMM; Brazzelli MG; Dinnes J; Gurusamy KS; Jones HE; Lange S; Langendam MW; Macaskill P; McInnes MDF; Reitsma JB; Rutjes AWS; Sinclair A; de Vet HCW; Virgili G; Wade R; Westwood ME
    Ann Intern Med; 2021 Nov; 174(11):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 34698503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.