These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34175161)

  • 21. Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study.
    Pancherz H; Michailidou C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):153-61; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Dento-facial structural characteristics in Angle Class II malocclusion associated with abnormal facial divergency].
    Wu KM; Chen YJ; Cheng MC; Chang HF; Chen KC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S130-8. PubMed ID: 1358360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions.
    Rongo R; Antoun JS; Lim YX; Dias G; Valletta R; Farella M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):788-94. PubMed ID: 24559507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gonial Angle by Lateral Cephalogram in Orthodontic Patients of a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
    Bajracharya M; Rajbhandari A; Pradhan R; Manandhar P; Maharjan S; Pant BD
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2021 May; 59(237):482-485. PubMed ID: 34508422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional evaluation of dentofacial transverse widths of adults with various vertical facial patterns.
    Hwang S; Jeong S; Choi YJ; Chung CJ; Lee HS; Kim KH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 29706217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting adult facial type from mandibular landmark data at young ages.
    Oh H; Knigge R; Hardin A; Sherwood R; Duren D; Valiathan M; Leary E; McNulty K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 May; 22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):154-162. PubMed ID: 31074133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Morphometric analysis of palatal rugae in different malocclusions.
    Saadeh ME; Haddad RV; Ghafari JG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Mar; 82(2):111-120. PubMed ID: 33108802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of mandibular divergence on facial soft tissue thickness in class I patients: a cephalometric study.
    Perović TM; Blažej M; Jovanović I
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2022; 81(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 33778942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cephalometric assessment of craniofacial morphology in patients with treacher Collins syndrome.
    Kapadia H; Shetye PR; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1141-5. PubMed ID: 23851757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Cephalometric comparisons of the craniofacial characteristics of Class II 1 malocclusions with different vertical types in adolescences].
    Ye Q; Zhao ZH; Zhao MY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Aug; 15(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 16955160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Maxillary and mandibular rotation type in normal and II (1) malocclusion adolescents with different growth patterns].
    Wu H; Zhou L; Zhou L; Li J; Wang YM
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 28(1):48-51, 56. PubMed ID: 20337075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of Vertical Facial Growth Pattern on Herbst Appliance Effects in Prepubertal Patients: A Retrospective Controlled Study.
    Giuca MR; Pasini M; Drago S; Del Corso L; Vanni A; Carli E; Manni A
    Int J Dent; 2020; 2020():1018793. PubMed ID: 32399031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis.
    Chen H; Liu Z; Hu X; Wu B; Gu Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):238. PubMed ID: 33952217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Alveolar and Skeletal Chin Dimensions Associated with Lower Facial Height Among Different Divergent Patterns.
    Khan MY; Kishore MS; Bukhari SA; Rachala MR; Sashidhar NR
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 May; 10(5):ZC75-80. PubMed ID: 27437365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Hasebe A; Yamaguchi T; Nakawaki T; Hikita Y; Katayama K; Maki K
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30475648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New insights on age-related association between nasopharyngeal airway clearance and facial morphology.
    Macari AT; Bitar MA; Ghafari JG
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Aug; 15(3):188-97. PubMed ID: 22812441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cortical bone and ridge thickness of hyperdivergent and hypodivergent adults.
    Horner KA; Behrents RG; Kim KB; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 22858325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Study of the canalis mandibulae morphology in different vertical facial types].
    Mártha I K; Bica C; Kész B; Kerekes Máthé B
    Orv Hetil; 2017 Nov; 158(46):1841-1847. PubMed ID: 29135290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative evaluation of retromolar space in adults with different vertical facial types.
    Zhao Z; Wang Q; Yi P; Huang F; Zhou X; Gao Q; Tsay TP; Liu C
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Nov; 90(6):857-865. PubMed ID: 33378518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.