160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34175170)
21. A Comparison of the Use of Glottal Fry in the Spontaneous Speech of Young and Middle-Aged American Women.
Oliveira G; Davidson A; Holczer R; Kaplan S; Paretzky A
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):684-687. PubMed ID: 26427301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Vocal Characteristics of Elderly Women Engaged in Aerobics in Private Institutions of Salvador, Bahia.
Colman Machado de Machado F; Cielo CA; Lessa MM; Barbosa LH
J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):127.e9-19. PubMed ID: 25795360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of a child's fundamental frequencies in structured elicited vocalizations versus unstructured natural vocalizations: a case study.
Hunter EJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 19185926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vocal Control: Is It Susceptible to the Negative Effects of Self-Regulatory Depletion?
Vinney LA; van Mersbergen M; Connor NP; Turkstra LS
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):638.e21-31. PubMed ID: 26804788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Effect of Loud Voice and Clear Speech on the Use of Vocal Fry in Women.
Behrman A; Akhund A
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2016; 68(4):159-166. PubMed ID: 28118633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Speech task effects on acoustic and aerodynamic measures of women with vocal nodules.
Sapienza CM; Stathopoulos ET
J Voice; 1995 Dec; 9(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 8574307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Acoustic Predictors of Gender Attribution, Masculinity-Femininity, and Vocal Naturalness Ratings Amongst Transgender and Cisgender Speakers.
Hardy TLD; Rieger JM; Wells K; Boliek CA
J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):300.e11-300.e26. PubMed ID: 30503396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dynamically Monitoring Vocal Fatigue and Recovery Using Aerodynamic, Acoustic, and Subjective Self-Rating Measurements.
Xue C; Kang J; Hedberg C; Zhang Y; Jiang JJ
J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):809.e11-809.e18. PubMed ID: 31543208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Interaction of Surface Hydration and Vocal Loading on Voice Measures.
Fujiki RB; Chapleau A; Sundarrajan A; McKenna V; Sivasankar MP
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):211-217. PubMed ID: 27522343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Immediate effect of inspiratory exercise with exerciser and respiratory encourager in women without vocal complaints.
Beraldo AT; Batistella J; Martins PDN; Dassie-Leite AP; Pereira EC
Codas; 2024; 36(4):e20230148. PubMed ID: 38775526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cepstral Measures in the Fado Voice: Gender, Age and Phonatory Tasks.
Mendes AP; Nunes N; Ibrahim S; Coelho AC; Francisco MA
J Voice; 2023 Jan; 37(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 33046277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Aerodynamic Patterns in Patients With Voice Disorders: A Retrospective Study.
Gilman M; Petty B; Maira C; Pethan M; Wang L; Hapner ER; Johns MM
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):545-549. PubMed ID: 28596100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Emirati Teachers' Perceptions of Voice Handicap.
Natour YS; Sartawi AM; Al Muhairy O; Efthymiou E; Marie BS
J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):378.e13-20. PubMed ID: 26117182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
Jannetts S; Lowit A
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Normative Study of Acoustic and Aerodynamic Characteristics of Voice among Healthy Adult Turkish Speaker Population.
Şen AZ; Toğram B
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():9217236. PubMed ID: 34957308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A quantitative method for the assessment of dysarthrophonia in myasthenia gravis.
Konstantopoulos K; Christou YP; Vogazianos P; Zamba-Papanicolaou E; Kleopa KA
J Neurol Sci; 2017 Jun; 377():42-46. PubMed ID: 28477705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differences on Voice Acoustic Parameters between Colombian College Professors with and without Vocal Fatigue.
Cantor-Cutiva LC; Robles-Vega HY; Sánchez EA; Morales DA
J Voice; 2022 Mar; 36(2):219-225. PubMed ID: 32564941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Average speaking fundamental frequency in soprano singers with and without symptoms of vocal attrition.
Drew R; Sapir S
J Voice; 1995 Jun; 9(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 7620535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Correlation of the Iranian Voice Quality of Life Profile (IVQLP) with Acoustic Measurements across Three Common Voice Disorders.
Dehqan A; Scherer RC; Yadegari F; Dashti G
J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):514.e7-514.e11. PubMed ID: 28965662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
