149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34175984)
1. Evaluation of the anatomical factors affecting the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for isolated lower pole kidney stones.
Tastemur S; Senel S; Kizilkan Y; Ozden C
Urolithiasis; 2022 Feb; 50(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 34175984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature.
Karim SS; Hanna L; Geraghty R; Somani BK
Urolithiasis; 2020 Jun; 48(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31372691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones.
Resorlu B; Oguz U; Resorlu EB; Oztuna D; Unsal A
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 21855968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. External validation of the R.I.R.S. scoring system to predict stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery.
Wang C; Wang S; Wang X; Lu J
BMC Urol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 33663459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Association of a Number of Anatomical Factors with the Success of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Lower Calyceal Stones.
Sari S; Ozok HU; Topaloglu H; Cakici MC; Ozdemir H; Karakoyunlu AN; Senturk AB; Ersoy H
Urol J; 2017 Jul; 14(4):4008-4014. PubMed ID: 28670667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones.
Kandemir A; Guven S; Balasar M; Sonmez MG; Taskapu H; Gurbuz R
World J Urol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1771-1776. PubMed ID: 28589217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower Pole Stones Greater than 2 cm.
Koyuncu H; Yencilek F; Kalkan M; Bastug Y; Yencilek E; Ozdemir AT
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 26005965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Size is Not Everything That Matters: Preoperative CT Predictors of Stone Free After RIRS.
Danilovic A; Rocha BA; Torricelli FCM; Marchini GS; Batagello C; Vicentini FC; Traxer O; Viana PCC; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
Urology; 2019 Oct; 132():63-68. PubMed ID: 31310774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External validation of the T.O.HO. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery.
Senel S; Kasap Y; Kizilkan Y; Tastemur S; Ozden C
BMC Urol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):68. PubMed ID: 35462554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1- to 2-cm lower-pole renal stones in patients with unfavorable infundibulopelvic anatomy: a matched-pair analysis.
Su B; Hu W; Xiao B; Liu Y; Ding T; Huang Z; Li J
World J Urol; 2024 May; 42(1):330. PubMed ID: 38753035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Factors Responsible for Stone-Free Status After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.
Raj K K; Adiga K P; Chandni Clara D'souza R; B N; Shetty M
Cureus; 2024 Jul; 16(7):e63627. PubMed ID: 38957512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of stone density on surgical outcomes of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery.
Aksoy SH; Cakiroglu B; Tas T; Yurdaisik I
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 95(1135):20220229. PubMed ID: 35357892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-Session Impact of High-Power Laser with Moses Technology for Lower Pole Stones in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Retrospective Study.
Inoue T; Hamamoto S; Okada S; Yamamichi F; Fujita M; Tominaga K; Tobe Y; Fujisawa M
J Clin Med; 2022 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 36615101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pelvicalyceal anatomy on the accessibility of reusable flexible ureteroscopy to lower pole calyx during retrograde intrarenal surgery.
Inoue T; Hamamoto S; Okada S; Imai S; Yamamichi F; Fujita M; Tominaga K; Fujisawa M
Int J Urol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 36305835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.
Vilches RM; Aliaga A; Reyes D; Sepulveda F; Mercado A; Moya F; Ledezma R; Hidalgo JP; Olmedo T; Marchant F
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 25435403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrograde intrarenal surgery using ureteral access sheaths is a safe and effective treatment for renal stones in children weighing <20 kg.
Berrettini A; Boeri L; Montanari E; Mogiatti M; Acquati P; De Lorenzis E; Gallioli A; De Marco EA; Minoli DG; Manzoni G
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Feb; 14(1):59.e1-59.e6. PubMed ID: 29195830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus a single-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole stones with a diameter of 15 to 30 mm: A propensity score-matching study.
Jung GH; Jung JH; Ahn TS; Lee JS; Cho SY; Jeong CW; Lee SB; Kim HH; Oh SJ
Korean J Urol; 2015 Jul; 56(7):525-32. PubMed ID: 26175872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of lower pole renal stones.
Grisard S; Franquet Q; Garnier-Crussard A; Poncet D; Overs C; Matillon X; Long JA; Descotes JL; Badet L; Abid N; Fiard G
Prog Urol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 34332831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. InsKid-a new mobile application (app) that measures the infundibulopelvic angle before retrograde intrarenal surgery more reliably than does other approaches: pilot study.
Guliev B; Komyakov B; Agagyulov M; Talyshinskii A
Clin Exp Nephrol; 2021 Feb; 25(2):207-212. PubMed ID: 33119809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stone in solitary kidney patients.
Lai D; Chen M; He Y; Li X; Wan S
Ren Fail; 2018 Nov; 40(1):390-394. PubMed ID: 30040518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
