BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34176148)

  • 1. Prioritizing actions: spatial action maps for conservation.
    Tallis H; Fargione J; Game E; McDonald R; Baumgarten L; Bhagabati N; Cortez R; Griscom B; Higgins J; Kennedy CM; Kiesecker J; Kroeger T; Leberer T; McGowan J; Mandle L; Masuda YJ; Morrison SA; Palmer S; Shirer R; Shyamsundar P; Wolff NH; Possingham HP
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2021 Dec; 1505(1):118-141. PubMed ID: 34176148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
    Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-action planning for threat management: a novel approach for the spatial prioritization of conservation actions.
    Cattarino L; Hermoso V; Carwardine J; Kennard MJ; Linke S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0128027. PubMed ID: 26020794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting practical conservation priorities for birds in the Western Andes of Colombia.
    Ocampo-Peñuela N; Pimm SL
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Oct; 28(5):1260-70. PubMed ID: 25065287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Avoiding costly conservation mistakes: the importance of defining actions and costs in spatial priority setting.
    Carwardine J; Wilson KA; Watts M; Etter A; Klein CJ; Possingham HP
    PLoS One; 2008 Jul; 3(7):e2586. PubMed ID: 18596914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Global biodiversity conservation priorities.
    Brooks TM; Mittermeier RA; da Fonseca GA; Gerlach J; Hoffmann M; Lamoreux JF; Mittermeier CG; Pilgrim JD; Rodrigues AS
    Science; 2006 Jul; 313(5783):58-61. PubMed ID: 16825561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-scale multi-level marine spatial planning: A novel methodological approach applied in South Africa.
    Lagabrielle E; Lombard AT; Harris JM; Livingstone TC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0192582. PubMed ID: 29969441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity.
    Schröter M; Rusch GM; Barton DN; Blumentrath S; Nordén B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112557. PubMed ID: 25393951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar.
    Neugarten RA; Honzák M; Carret P; Koenig K; Andriamaro L; Cano CA; Grantham HS; Hole D; Juhn D; McKinnon M; Rasolohery A; Steininger M; Wright TM; Turner WR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168575. PubMed ID: 28006005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A global mismatch in the protection of multiple marine biodiversity components and ecosystem services.
    Lindegren M; Holt BG; MacKenzie BR; Rahbek C
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4099. PubMed ID: 29511276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mapping ecosystem services for land use planning, the case of Central Kalimantan.
    Sumarga E; Hein L
    Environ Manage; 2014 Jul; 54(1):84-97. PubMed ID: 24794194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimized spatial priorities for biodiversity conservation in China: a systematic conservation planning perspective.
    Wu R; Long Y; Malanson GP; Garber PA; Zhang S; Li D; Zhao P; Wang L; Duo H
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103783. PubMed ID: 25072933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services.
    Snäll T; Lehtomäki J; Arponen A; Elith J; Moilanen A
    Environ Manage; 2016 Feb; 57(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 26395184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating fisheries conservation strategies in the socio-ecological system: A grid-based dynamic model to link spatial conservation prioritization tools with tactical fisheries management.
    Li Y; Sun M; Zhang C; Zhang Y; Xu B; Ren Y; Chen Y
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230946. PubMed ID: 32243469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
    Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecological forecasts to inform near-term management of threats to biodiversity.
    Tulloch AIT; Hagger V; Greenville AC
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Oct; 26(10):5816-5828. PubMed ID: 32652624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial prioritization for widespread invasive species control: Trade-offs between current impact and future spread.
    Carter S; Mills C; Hao Z; Mott R; Hauser CE; White M; Sharples J; Taylor J; Moore JL
    Ecol Appl; 2024 Jul; 34(5):e2982. PubMed ID: 38831569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of the state of conservation planning in Europe.
    Jung M; Alagador D; Chapman M; Hermoso V; Kujala H; O'Connor L; Schinegger R; Verburg PH; Visconti P
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2024 May; 379(1902):20230015. PubMed ID: 38583468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities.
    Naidoo R; Balmford A; Costanza R; Fisher B; Green RE; Lehner B; Malcolm TR; Ricketts TH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(28):9495-500. PubMed ID: 18621701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits.
    Annis GM; Pearsall DR; Kahl KJ; Washburn EL; May CA; Franks Taylor R; Cole JB; Ewert DN; Game ET; Doran PJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172458. PubMed ID: 28241018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.