BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34176357)

  • 21. Comparing doctors' legal compliance across three Australian states for decisions whether to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment: does different law lead to different decisions?
    White BP; Willmott L; Cartwright C; Parker M; Williams G; Davis J
    BMC Palliat Care; 2017 Nov; 16(1):63. PubMed ID: 29179708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors which motivate cancer doctors to involve their patients in reaching treatment decisions.
    Shepherd HL; Butow PN; Tattersall MH
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Aug; 84(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 21112174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors influencing communication and decision-making about life-sustaining technology during serious illness: a qualitative study.
    Kryworuchko J; Strachan PH; Nouvet E; Downar J; You JJ
    BMJ Open; 2016 May; 6(5):e010451. PubMed ID: 27217281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The considerations, experiences and support needs of family members making treatment decisions for patients admitted with major stroke: a qualitative study.
    Visvanathan A; Mead GE; Dennis M; Whiteley WN; Doubal FN; Lawton J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jun; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 32487145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "It's better to have three brains working instead of one": a qualitative study of building therapeutic alliance with family members of critically ill patients.
    Kalocsai C; Amaral A; Piquette D; Walter G; Dev SP; Taylor P; Downar J; Gotlib Conn L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jul; 18(1):533. PubMed ID: 29986722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
    Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Initiating decision-making conversations in palliative care: an ethnographic discourse analysis.
    Bélanger E; Rodríguez C; Groleau D; Légaré F; Macdonald ME; Marchand R
    BMC Palliat Care; 2014; 13():63. PubMed ID: 25859161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. End-of-life decisions in neonatal care: a conversation analytical study.
    Marlow N; Shaw C; Connabeer K; Aladangady N; Gallagher K; Drew P
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2021 Mar; 106(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 32943530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Difficulties Doctors Experience during Life-Sustaining Treatment Discussion after Enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Yoo SH; Choi W; Kim Y; Kim MS; Park HY; Keam B; Heo DS
    Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Apr; 53(2):584-592. PubMed ID: 33211941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bereaved families' experiences of end-of-life decision making for general medicine patients.
    Moon F; Mooney C; McDermott F; Miller A; Poon P
    BMJ Support Palliat Care; 2021 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 33722814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support.
    Abbott KH; Sago JG; Breen CM; Abernethy AP; Tulsky JA
    Crit Care Med; 2001 Jan; 29(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 11176185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How doctors communicated with parents in a neonatal intensive care: Communication and ethical issues.
    Sorin G; Dany L; Vialet R; Thomachot L; Hassid S; Michel F; Tosello B
    Acta Paediatr; 2021 Jan; 110(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 32364306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pediatric intensive care unit family conferences: one mode of communication for discussing end-of-life care decisions.
    Michelson KN; Emanuel L; Carter A; Brinkman P; Clayman ML; Frader J
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2011 Nov; 12(6):e336-43. PubMed ID: 21478794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Pediatric Intensivists' Attitudes toward End-of-Life Care in Vietnam.
    Fadadu PP; Liu JC; Schiltz BM; Xoay TD; Phuc PH; Kumbamu A; Ouellette Y
    J Palliat Med; 2019 Aug; 22(8):885-893. PubMed ID: 30724688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment: examining the experiences of resident physicians and seriously-ill hospitalized patients.
    Deep KS; Griffith CH; Wilson JF
    J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Nov; 23(11):1877-82. PubMed ID: 18800206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Withholding/Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment in a Multiethnic Critical Care Setting: An Ethnographic Study.
    Van Keer RL; Deschepper R; Huyghens L; Bilsen J
    J Palliat Med; 2021 Mar; 24(3):338-346. PubMed ID: 32721261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceived quality of palliative care in intensive care units among doctors and nurses in Taiwan.
    Ke YX; Hu SH; Takemura N; Lin CC
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2019 Dec; 31(10):741-747. PubMed ID: 30855672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.