These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34176898)

  • 1. The Future of the Plastic Surgery Match: Implications of Applicant Familiarity.
    Aryanpour Z; Boyd CJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Sep; 87(3):231. PubMed ID: 34176898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Independent Plastic Surgery Match (2010-2018): Applicant and Program Trends, Predictors of a Successful Match, and Future Directions.
    Azoury SC; Kozak GM; Stranix JT; Colen DL; Piwnica-Worms W; Fosnot J; Serletti JM; Kovach SJ
    J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(1):219-228. PubMed ID: 31405800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discussion: A Closer Look at the 2013 to 2014 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.
    Nayar HS; Salyapongse AN; Bentz ML
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):630e-631e. PubMed ID: 26910707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Updated View of the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.
    Borsting EA; Chim JH; Thaller SR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Nov; 75(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 26418789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of a Secondary Application to Increase Efficiency in the Plastic Surgery Match.
    Boyd CJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 May; 84(5):475. PubMed ID: 32079813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Closer Look at the 2013 to 2014 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.
    Kling RE; Kling RR; Agi C; Toirac A; Manders EK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):624e-629e. PubMed ID: 26910706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Plastic Surgery Match: A Quantitative Analysis of Applicant Impressions From the Interview Visit.
    Frojo G; Tadisina KK; Pressman Z; Chibnall JT; Lin AY; Kraemer BA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Dec; 77(6):587-591. PubMed ID: 27740953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery (OPRS) fellowships: assessment and comparative data from the 2009 Specialties Matching Service.
    Dewan MA; Meyer DR
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010; 26(6):398-9. PubMed ID: 20622699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insights from San Francisco match rank lists, part II: are programs doing it wrong?
    Nagarkar PA; Malafa M; Janis JE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Oct; 73(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 25222925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting plastic surgery residents: one picture is worth a thousand words.
    Evans GR
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Mar; 30(2):267-8. PubMed ID: 20442107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Matching for success or success in matching.
    Freshwater MF
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(4):477-8. PubMed ID: 18358438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome analysis of factors impacting the plastic surgery match.
    Wood JS; David LR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 64(6):770-4. PubMed ID: 20489406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response letter re: Objective assessment of surgical performance and its impact on a national selection programme. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:1543-9.
    Pollock JC; Rodrigues JN; Raurell A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Jul; 63(7):e584. PubMed ID: 20138018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Foreign education and scientific research: a Canadian experience.
    Vico P
    Acta Chir Belg; 1992; 92(2):78-81. PubMed ID: 1604950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Craniofacial Surgery Fellowship Selection Criteria: A National Program Director Survey.
    Egro FM; Blecher NA; Losee JE; Nguyen VT; Goldstein J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):1132-1135. PubMed ID: 28582291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying to Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Programs: Trends in the Past 5 Years of the Match.
    Tadisina KK; Orra S; Bassiri Gharb B; Kwiecien G; Bernard S; Zins JE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 26761515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The "Independent" Plastic Surgery Match: Analysis of Changes in Recent Years and Applicant Preferences.
    Hammoudeh ZS; Mostafa G; Saint-Cyr M; Bakri K; Mardini S
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27886967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microsurgery Fellowship Selection Criteria: A National Program Director Survey.
    Egro FM; Blecher NA; Gimbel ML; Nguyen VT
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 Mar; 33(3):206-210. PubMed ID: 27978581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geographic Trends in the Plastic Surgery Match.
    Silvestre J; Lin IC; Serletti JM; Chang B
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 26774936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fellowship selection criteria in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.
    Meyer DR; Dewan MA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010; 26(5):357-9. PubMed ID: 20592634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.