These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34177127)

  • 1. BiLSTM and dynamic fuzzy AHP-GA method for procedural game level generation.
    İnce M
    Neural Comput Appl; 2021; 33(15):9761-9773. PubMed ID: 34177127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Cooperative Game Theory Combined Multiple Mobile Robot Navigation Algorithm.
    Kim C; Won JS
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(10):. PubMed ID: 32429339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bimodal fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (BFAHP) for coronary heart disease risk assessment.
    Sabahi F
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jul; 83():204-216. PubMed ID: 29625186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of GIS-based AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for hospital site selection: a case study for Prayagraj City, India.
    Tripathi AK; Agrawal S; Gupta RD
    GeoJournal; 2022; 87(5):3507-3528. PubMed ID: 34075269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distance education tool selection using novel spherical fuzzy AHP EDAS.
    Menekşe A; Camgöz Akdağ H
    Soft comput; 2022; 26(4):1617-1635. PubMed ID: 35095335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of improved fuzzy best worst analytic hierarchy process on renewable energy.
    Majumder P; Balas VE; Paul A; Baidya D
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e453. PubMed ID: 33954237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A hybrid fuzzy logic/constraint satisfaction problem approach to automatic decision making in simulation game models.
    Braathen S; Sendstad OJ
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2004 Aug; 34(4):1786-97. PubMed ID: 15462445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
    Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Hybrid Fuzzy Decision Model for Evaluating MEMS and IC Integration Technologies.
    Lee QY; Lee MX; Lee YC
    Micromachines (Basel); 2021 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 33799935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS.
    Nabizadeh R; Yousefzadeh S; Yaghmaeian K; Alimohammadi M; Mokhtari Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):20437-20448. PubMed ID: 34735703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Green Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Artificial Neural Networks.
    Gegovska T; Koker R; Cakar T
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2020; 2020():8811834. PubMed ID: 33082775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Studying Significant Factors Associated with Frequent Lane Changing.
    Moslem S; Farooq D; Jamal A; Almarhabi Y; Almoshaogeh M; Butt FM; Tufail RF
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Mar; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 35327878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of dominant risk factor involved in spread of COVID-19 using hesitant fuzzy MCDM methodology.
    Ghorui N; Ghosh A; Mondal SP; Bajuri MY; Ahmadian A; Salahshour S; Ferrara M
    Results Phys; 2021 Feb; 21():103811. PubMed ID: 33520630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the quality of health and safety services with SERVPERF and multi-attribute decision-making methods.
    Alp S; Yilmaz F; Geçici E
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Dec; 28(4):2216-2226. PubMed ID: 34556013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():501. PubMed ID: 27186465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Influenza Intervention Strategies in Turkey with Fuzzy AHP-VIKOR.
    Samanlioglu F
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():9486070. PubMed ID: 31827743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC method based on multi-criteria decision analysis.
    Zarin R; Azmat M; Naqvi SR; Saddique Q; Ullah S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(16):19726-19741. PubMed ID: 33410005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hierarchical gene selection and genetic fuzzy system for cancer microarray data classification.
    Nguyen T; Khosravi A; Creighton D; Nahavandi S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120364. PubMed ID: 25823003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Fuzzy-Based Decision Support Model for Selecting the Best Dialyser Flux in Haemodialysis.
    Oztürk N; Tozan H
    J Healthc Eng; 2015; 6(3):303-24. PubMed ID: 26753437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Norm-dist Monte-Carlo integrative method for the improvement of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.
    Wicaksono FD; Arshad YB; Sihombing H
    Heliyon; 2020 Apr; 6(4):e03607. PubMed ID: 32346625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.