249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34177408)
1. Inter, intra-examiner reliability and validity of inertial sensors to measure the active cervical range of motion in patients with primary headache.
Elizagaray-García I; Gil-Martínez A; Navarro-Fernández G; Navarro-Moreno AR; Sánchez-de-Toro-Hernández J; Díaz-de-Terán J; Lerma-Lara S
EXCLI J; 2021; 20():879-893. PubMed ID: 34177408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and reliability of inertial sensors for elbow and wrist range of motion assessment.
Costa V; Ramírez Ó; Otero A; Muñoz-García D; Uribarri S; Raya R
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9687. PubMed ID: 32864213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of cervical active range of movement in young asymptomatic adults using inertial sensors.
Anoro-Hervera A; Lafuente-Pérez A; Navarro-Fernández G; Muñoz-García D; Lerma-Lara S; Beltran-Alacreu H
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2019 Dec; 16(12):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 31752559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel virtual reality application for autonomous assessment of cervical range of motion: development and reliability study.
Santos-Paz JA; Sánchez-Picot Á; Rojo A; Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A; Otero A; Garcia-Carmona R
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14031. PubMed ID: 36124134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concurrent validity and reliability of measuring range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation test with a novel digital goniometer.
Luedtke K; Schoettker-Königer T; Hall T; Reimer C; Grassold M; Hasselhoff-Styhler P; Neulinger C; Obrocki M; Przyhoda P; Schäfer A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):535. PubMed ID: 32781990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reliability of Veloflex to measure active cervical range of motion in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.
Cánovas-Ambit G; García-Vidal JA; Martín-San Agustín R; Dalla-Vecchia AA; Sánchez-Barbadora M; Medina-Mirapeix F
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11228. PubMed ID: 33868830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of a Coda Motion 3-D Analysis system for measuring cervical range of motion in healthy subjects.
Song H; Zhai X; Gao Z; Lu T; Tian Q; Li H; He X
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2018 Feb; 38():56-66. PubMed ID: 29169054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants.
Tousignant-Laflamme Y; Boutin N; Dion AM; Vallée CA
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jul; 10(1):69. PubMed ID: 23829201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and Validity of A Novel Device for Evaluating the Cervical Proprioception.
Zhang M; Chen XY; Fu SY; Li DF; Zhao GN; Huang AB
Pain Ther; 2023 Jun; 12(3):671-682. PubMed ID: 36867364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concurrent Validity and Reliability of an Inertial Measurement Unit for the Assessment of Craniocervical Range of Motion in Subjects with Cerebral Palsy.
Carmona-Pérez C; Garrido-Castro JL; Torres Vidal F; Alcaraz-Clariana S; García-Luque L; Alburquerque-Sendín F; Rodrigues-de-Souza DP
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 32024117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Test - re-test reliability and concurrent validity of cervical active range of motion in young asymptomatic adults using a new inertial measurement unit device.
Chalimourdas A; Dimitriadis Z; Kapreli E; Strimpakos N
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Oct; 18(10):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 34420436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement proprieties of the CROM instrument for assessing head posture, neck retraction and protraction.
Elizagaray-García I; Obispo-Villamayor Á; Prats-Martínez C; Prieto-Hernández G; Carvalho GF
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2024 Jun; 71():102950. PubMed ID: 38574577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reliability and validity of a novel wearable inertial sensor to measure the cervical proprioception.
Wang J; Wang R; Zhao P; Han T; Cui X; He Y; Li M
Med Eng Phys; 2024 Mar; 125():104125. PubMed ID: 38508802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement and reliability of two non-invasive methods for assessing cervical range of motion among young adults.
Florêncio LL; Pereira PA; Silva ER; Pegoretti KS; Gonçalves MC; Bevilaqua-Grossi D
Rev Bras Fisioter; 2010; 14(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 20464161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device.
Audette I; Dumas JP; Côté JN; De Serres SJ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 May; 40(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 20436238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Units in Active Range of Motion Assessment in the Hip Joint.
Stołowski Ł; Niedziela M; Lubiatowski B; Lubiatowski P; Piontek T
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Oct; 23(21):. PubMed ID: 37960493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of electromagnetic tracking technology for measurement of passive cervical range of motion: a pilot study.
Morphett AL; Crawford CM; Lee D
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 12704307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shoulder Range of Motion Measurement Using Inertial Measurement Unit-Concurrent Validity and Reliability.
Kaszyński J; Baka C; Białecka M; Lubiatowski P
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 37687955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Reliability and Validity of Wearable Inertial Sensors Coupled with the Microsoft Kinect to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion.
Beshara P; Chen JF; Read AC; Lagadec P; Wang T; Walsh WR
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33348775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel use of inertial sensors to measure the craniocervical flexion range of motion associated to the craniocervical flexion test: an observational study.
Pérez-Fernández T; Armijo-Olivo S; Liébana S; de la Torre Ortíz PJ; Fernández-Carnero J; Raya R; Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Nov; 17(1):152. PubMed ID: 33213452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
