BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34178151)

  • 1. From clinics to (cow)mics: a reproductive journey.
    Humblot P
    Anim Reprod; 2018 Aug; 15(3):278-291. PubMed ID: 34178151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in cattle.
    Humblot P; Le Bourhis D; Fritz S; Colleau JJ; Gonzalez C; Guyader Joly C; Malafosse A; Heyman Y; Amigues Y; Tissier M; Ponsart C
    Vet Med Int; 2010 Oct; 2010():192787. PubMed ID: 20981298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Ponsart C; Le Bourhis D; Knijn H; Fritz S; Guyader-Joly C; Otter T; Lacaze S; Charreaux F; Schibler L; Dupassieux D; Mullaart E
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2013; 26(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 24305173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased genetic gains in sheep, beef and dairy breeding programs from using female reproductive technologies combined with optimal contribution selection and genomic breeding values.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):70. PubMed ID: 26370143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimizing female allocation to reproductive technologies considering merit, inbreeding and cost in nucleus breeding programmes with genomic selection.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 30585664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetics and genomics of reproductive performance in dairy and beef cattle.
    Berry DP; Wall E; Pryce JE
    Animal; 2014 May; 8 Suppl 1():105-21. PubMed ID: 24703258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting commercial application of embryo technologies in New Zealand: a modelling approach.
    Smeaton DC; Harris BL; Xu ZZ; Vivanco WH
    Theriogenology; 2003 Jan; 59(2):617-34. PubMed ID: 12499008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review: Opportunities and challenges for small populations of dairy cattle in the era of genomics.
    Schöpke K; Swalve HH
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 26957010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symposium review: The choice and collection of new relevant phenotypes for fertility selection.
    Fleming A; Baes CF; Martin AAA; Chud TCS; Malchiodi F; Brito LF; Miglior F
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3722-3734. PubMed ID: 30712934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive biology in the era of genomics biology.
    Bazer FW; Spencer TE
    Theriogenology; 2005 Aug; 64(3):442-56. PubMed ID: 15946735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perspectives for artificial insemination and genomics to improve global swine populations.
    Gerrits RJ; Lunney JK; Johnson LA; Pursel VG; Kraeling RR; Rohrer GA; Dobrinsky JR
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):283-99. PubMed ID: 15626400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current and future assisted reproductive technologies for mammalian farm animals.
    Hansen PJ
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 752():1-22. PubMed ID: 24170352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impacts of reproductive technologies on beef production in the United States.
    Dahlen C; Larson J; Lamb GC
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 752():97-114. PubMed ID: 24170356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A 100-Year Review: Practical female reproductive management.
    Stevenson JS; Britt JH
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Dec; 100(12):10292-10313. PubMed ID: 29153166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genotyping strategies of selection candidates in livestock breeding programmes.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 30690805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining cow and bull reference populations to increase accuracy of genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6703-15. PubMed ID: 23891299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproductive technologies combine well with genomic selection in dairy breeding programs.
    Thomasen JR; Willam A; Egger-Danner C; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Feb; 99(2):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 26686703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cow genotyping strategies for genomic selection in a small dairy cattle population.
    Jenko J; Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Eaglen SAE; Luff WGL; Bichard M; Pong-Wong R; Woolliams JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):439-452. PubMed ID: 27837974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted reproductive techniques for cattle breeding in developing countries: a critical appraisal of their value and limitations.
    Rodriguez-Martinez H
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2012 Jan; 47 Suppl 1():21-6. PubMed ID: 22212208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancement of Plant Productivity in the Post-Genomics Era.
    Thao NP; Tran LS
    Curr Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(4):295-6. PubMed ID: 27499678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.