172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34179162)
1. Using a Bayesian Network Predictive Model to Understand Vulnerability of Australian Sheep Producers to a Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak.
Manyweathers J; Maru Y; Hayes L; Loechel B; Kruger H; Mankad A; Xie G; Woodgate R; Hernandez-Jover M
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():668679. PubMed ID: 34179162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding the vulnerability of beef producers in Australia to an FMD outbreak using a Bayesian Network predictive model.
Manyweathers J; Maru Y; Hayes L; Loechel B; Kruger H; Mankad A; Xie G; Woodgate R; Hernandez-Jover M
Prev Vet Med; 2020 Feb; 175():104872. PubMed ID: 31981953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The goat industry in Australia: Using Bayesian network analysis to understand vulnerability to a foot and mouth disease outbreak.
Manyweathers J; Maru Y; Hayes L; Loechel B; Kruger H; Mankad A; Xie G; Woodgate R; Hernandez-Jover M
Prev Vet Med; 2021 Feb; 187():105236. PubMed ID: 33385617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biosecurity and the management of emergency animal disease among commercial beef producers in New South Wales and Queensland (Australia).
Hernández-Jover M; Higgins V; Bryant M; Rast L; McShane C
Prev Vet Med; 2016 Nov; 134():92-102. PubMed ID: 27836050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On-farm evaluation of a predictive model for Australian beef and sheep producers' vulnerability to an outbreak of foot and mouth disease.
Manyweathers J; Hayes L; Xie G; Gardner H; Maru Y; Woodgate R; Hernandez-Jover M
Prev Vet Med; 2022 Jul; 204():105656. PubMed ID: 35525067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On-farm characteristics and biosecurity protocols for small-scale swine producers in eastern Australia.
Schembri N; Hernandez-Jover M; Toribio JA; Holyoake PK
Prev Vet Med; 2015 Jan; 118(1):104-16. PubMed ID: 25433716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing Biosecurity Risks for the Introduction and Spread of Diseases Among Commercial Sheep Properties in New South Wales, Australia, Using Foot-and-Mouth Disease as a Case Study.
Fountain J; Woodgate R; Rast L; Hernández-Jover M
Front Vet Sci; 2018; 5():80. PubMed ID: 29755989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. Cattle Producer Adoption of Secure Beef Supply Plan Enhanced Biosecurity Practices and Foot-and-Mouth Disease Preparedness.
Pudenz CC; Mitchell JL; Schulz LL; Tonsor GT
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():660857. PubMed ID: 34422939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Knowledge and attitudes of Australian livestock producers concerning biosecurity practices.
Paquette CC; Schemann KA; Ward MP
Aust Vet J; 2020 Nov; 98(11):533-545. PubMed ID: 32754999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dairy goat producers' understanding, knowledge and attitudes towards biosecurity and Q-fever in Australia.
Gunther MJ; Heller J; Hayes L; Hernandez-Jover M
Prev Vet Med; 2019 Oct; 170():104742. PubMed ID: 31421494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparative Assessment of the Risks of Introduction and Spread of Foot-and-Mouth Disease among Different Pig Sectors in Australia.
Hernández-Jover M; Schembri N; Holyoake PK; Toribio JL; Martin PA
Front Vet Sci; 2016; 3():85. PubMed ID: 27713881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Australian surveys on parasite control in sheep between 2003 and 2019 reveal marked regional variation and increasing utilisation of online resources and on-farm biosecurity practices.
Colvin AF; Reeve I; Thompson LJ; Kahn LP; Walkden-Brown SW
Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports; 2021 Jul; 25():100614. PubMed ID: 34474778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pig producers' perceptions of the Influenza Pandemic H1N1/09 outbreak and its effect on their biosecurity practices in Australia.
Hernández-Jover M; Taylor M; Holyoake P; Dhand N
Prev Vet Med; 2012 Oct; 106(3-4):284-94. PubMed ID: 22487168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Australian beef producers' knowledge and attitudes relating to hydatid disease are associated with their control practices.
Wilson CS; Jenkins DJ; Barnes TS; Brookes VJ
Prev Vet Med; 2020 Sep; 182():105078. PubMed ID: 32707375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utilizing qualitative methods in survey design: examining Texas cattle producers' intent to participate in foot-and-mouth disease detection and control.
Delgado AH; Norby B; Dean WR; McIntosh WA; Scott HM
Prev Vet Med; 2012 Feb; 103(2-3):120-35. PubMed ID: 21968089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distribution of cow-calf producers' beliefs about reporting cattle with clinical signs of foot-and-mouth disease to a veterinarian before or during a hypothetical outbreak.
Delgado AH; Norby B; Scott HM; Dean W; McIntosh WA; Bush E
Prev Vet Med; 2014 Dec; 117(3-4):505-17. PubMed ID: 25449736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modelling the spread of foot-and-mouth disease in Australia.
Garner MG; Beckett SD
Aust Vet J; 2005 Dec; 83(12):758-66. PubMed ID: 16395942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of smallholder farmer biosecurity and implications for sustainable foot-and-mouth disease control in Cambodia.
Young JR; Suon S; Olmo L; Bun C; Hok C; Ashley K; Bush RD; Windsor PA
Transbound Emerg Dis; 2017 Dec; 64(6):2000-2012. PubMed ID: 28116869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of a scoring system to assess the relative vulnerability of swine breeding herds to the introduction of PRRS virus.
Silva GS; Corbellini LG; Linhares DLC; Baker KL; Holtkamp DJ
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 160():116-122. PubMed ID: 30388993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulating human behavioral changes in livestock production systems during an epidemic: The case of the US beef cattle industry.
Yang Q; Gruenbacher DM; Brase GL; Heier Stamm JL; DeLoach SA; Scoglio CM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253498. PubMed ID: 34166451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
