These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 341793)

  • 1. Statistics and data analysis: trading bias for reduced mean squared error.
    Winer BJ
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1978; 29():647-81. PubMed ID: 341793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A reviewer's perspective on multiple endpoint issues in clinical trials.
    Huque MF; Sankoh AJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Nov; 7(4):545-64. PubMed ID: 9358328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo simulation of statistical power.
    Borenstein M; Kane J; Buchbinder J
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1987; 23(2):300-2. PubMed ID: 3615781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo verification of the scalogram model.
    Luks A; Komenda S; Svoboda J
    Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med; 1982; 102():227-44. PubMed ID: 6242576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applications of multiple imputation to the analysis of censored regression data.
    Wei GC; Tanner MA
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1297-309. PubMed ID: 1786320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of three strategies for interim analysis in an ongoing study.
    Overall JE; Gibson JM; Cecil SL
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1989; 25(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 2772113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistics for clinicians. 7. Interval data (III).
    Nanivadekar AS; Kannappan AR
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1991 Jul; 39(7):549-53. PubMed ID: 1800502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using multiple imputation methods to estimate relative risks in small EPIC lung cancer subsets.
    Altenburg HP; Agudo A; Berrino F; Boshuizen HC; Bueno-de-Mesquita HB; Janzon L; Le Marchand L; Linseisen J; Lukanova A; Rasmuson T; Vineis P; Riboli E; Miller A;
    IARC Sci Publ; 2002; 156():53-4. PubMed ID: 12484123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations.
    Hittner JB; May K; Silver NC
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 12773018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of the rank transform in designed experiments.
    Sawilowsky SS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Apr; 90(2):489-97. PubMed ID: 10833745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of cross-validated multiple correlation: a clarification.
    Rozeboom WW
    Psychol Bull; 1978 Nov; 85(6):1348-51. PubMed ID: 734018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival estimation using splines.
    Whittemore AS; Keller JB
    Biometrics; 1986 Sep; 42(3):495-506. PubMed ID: 3471280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of change.
    Dotson CO
    Exerc Sport Sci Rev; 1973; 1():393-419. PubMed ID: 4806383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two methods for making statistical inferences on Nei's measure of genetic distance.
    Mueller LD
    Biometrics; 1979 Dec; 35(4):757-63. PubMed ID: 526522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design of adaptive two-stage double-arm clinical trials for dichotomous variables.
    Jiang Z; Xue F; Li C; Wang L; Cai H; Zhang C; Xia J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 May; 31(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 20172053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for response misclassification and covariate measurement error improves power and reduces bias in epidemiologic studies.
    Cheng D; Branscum AJ; Stamey JD
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 20538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3582958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying measurement disturbance effects using Rasch item fit statistics and the Logit Residual Index.
    Mount RE; Schumacker RE
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(4):338-50. PubMed ID: 9803719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. F-type statistics and the analysis of binomial data with overdispersion.
    Mauromoustakos A; McNew RW
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Jul; 4(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 7951274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing overall and moderator effects in random effects meta-regression.
    Huizenga HM; Visser I; Dolan CV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Feb; 64(Pt 1):1-19. PubMed ID: 21506942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.