252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34180520)
21. Artificial light at night (ALAN) affects behaviour, but does not change oxidative status in freshwater shredders.
Czarnecka M; Jermacz Ł; Glazińska P; Kulasek M; Kobak J
Environ Pollut; 2022 Aug; 306():119476. PubMed ID: 35580711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Artificial light at night may decrease predation risk for terrestrial insects.
Eckhartt GM; Ruxton GD
Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220281. PubMed ID: 36349582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Artificial lighting impairs mate attraction in a nocturnal capital breeder.
Stewart AJA; Perl CD; Niven JE
J Exp Biol; 2020 Sep; 223(Pt 19):. PubMed ID: 32665443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of artificial light at night on the foraging behavior of an endangered nocturnal mammal.
Shier DM; Bird AK; Wang TB
Environ Pollut; 2020 Aug; 263(Pt A):114566. PubMed ID: 32320890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Light pollution: a landscape-scale issue requiring cross-realm consideration.
Mayer-Pinto M; Jones TM; Swearer SE; Robert KA; Bolton D; Aulsebrook AE; Dafforn KA; Dickerson AL; Dimovski AM; Hubbard N; McLay LK; Pendoley K; Poore AGB; Thums M; Willmott NJ; Yokochi K; Fobert EK
UCL Open Environ; 2022; 4():e036. PubMed ID: 37228454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Direct and Ambient Light Pollution Alters Recruitment for a Diurnal Plant-Pollinator System.
Wilson AA; Seymoure BM; Jaeger S; Milstead B; Payne H; Peria L; Vosbigian RA; Francis CD
Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Oct; 61(3):1122-1133. PubMed ID: 33724371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Matthew effect: Common species become more common and rare ones become more rare in response to artificial light at night.
Liu Y; Speißer B; Knop E; van Kleunen M
Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Jun; 28(11):3674-3682. PubMed ID: 35152520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Artificial light and biting flies: the parallel development of attractive light traps and unattractive domestic lights.
Wilson R; Wakefield A; Roberts N; Jones G
Parasit Vectors; 2021 Jan; 14(1):28. PubMed ID: 33413591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing spatial deposition of aquatic subsidies by insects emerging from agricultural streams.
Raitif J; Roussel JM; Olmos M; Piscart C; Plantegenest M
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 837():155686. PubMed ID: 35523331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microbial diversity and community respiration in freshwater sediments influenced by artificial light at night.
Hölker F; Wurzbacher C; Weißenborn C; Monaghan MT; Holzhauer SI; Premke K
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 May; 370(1667):. PubMed ID: 25780242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mapping the fine-scale spatial pattern of artificial light pollution at night in urban environments from the perspective of bird habitats.
Xue X; Lin Y; Zheng Q; Wang K; Zhang J; Deng J; Abubakar GA; Gan M
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134725. PubMed ID: 31734607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spectrum of artificial light at night drives impact of a diurnal species in insect food web.
Sanders D; Baker DJ; Cruse D; Bell F; van Veen FJF; Gaston KJ
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 831():154893. PubMed ID: 35364173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Wavelength-specific negatively phototactic responses of the burrowing mayfly larvae Ephoron virgo.
Mészáros Á; Kriska G; Egri Á
J Exp Biol; 2024 May; 227(10):. PubMed ID: 38699809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis.
Owens ACS; Lewis SM
Ecol Evol; 2018 Nov; 8(22):11337-11358. PubMed ID: 30519447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Artificial Light at Night Alleviates the Negative Effect of Pb on Freshwater Ecosystems.
Pu G; Zeng D; Mo L; Liao J; Chen X
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 30884876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Migratory bats respond to artificial green light with positive phototaxis.
Voigt CC; Roeleke M; Marggraf L; Pētersons G; Voigt-Heucke SL
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177748. PubMed ID: 28562607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Insect communities under skyglow: diffuse night-time illuminance induces spatio-temporal shifts in movement and predation.
Dyer A; Ryser R; Brose U; Amyntas A; Bodnar N; Boy T; Franziska Bucher S; Cesarz S; Eisenhauer N; Gebler A; Hines J; Kyba CCM; Menz MHM; Rackwitz K; Shatwell T; Terlau JF; Hirt MR
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Dec; 378(1892):20220359. PubMed ID: 37899019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Costs and benefits of "insect friendly" artificial lights are taxon specific.
Owens ACS; Dressler CT; Lewis SM
Oecologia; 2022 Jun; 199(2):487-497. PubMed ID: 35650413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Global erosion of terrestrial environmental space by artificial light at night.
Cox DTC; Gaston KJ
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 904():166701. PubMed ID: 37652384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Artificial light impairs local attraction to females in male glow-worms.
Moubarak EM; David Fernandes AS; Stewart AJA; Niven JE
J Exp Biol; 2023 Jun; 226(11):. PubMed ID: 37311409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
