116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34180782)
1. The Impact of Pitch on Tempo-Spatial Accuracy and Precision in Intercepting a Virtually Moving Ball.
Tolentino-Castro JW; Schroeger A; Cañal-Bruland R; Raab M
J Mot Behav; 2022; 54(2):158-172. PubMed ID: 34180782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of visual blur and contrast on spatial and temporal precision in manual interception.
Schroeger A; Tolentino-Castro JW; Raab M; Cañal-Bruland R
Exp Brain Res; 2021 Nov; 239(11):3343-3358. PubMed ID: 34480594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing auditory intensity enhances temporal but deteriorates spatial accuracy in a virtual interception task.
Tolentino-Castro JW; Schroeger A; Cañal-Bruland R; Raab M
Exp Brain Res; 2024 Apr; 242(4):937-947. PubMed ID: 38334793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of interception of moving targets by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in an automated task.
Iversen IH; Matsuzawa T
Anim Cogn; 2003 Sep; 6(3):169-83. PubMed ID: 12761656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grasping in One-Handed Catching in Relation to Performance.
Cesqui B; Russo M; Lacquaniti F; d'Avella A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158606. PubMed ID: 27392041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How people achieve their amazing temporal precision in interception.
Brenner E; Smeets JB
J Vis; 2015 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 25767094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Constraints on the spatiotemporal accuracy of interceptive action: effects of target size on hitting a moving target.
Tresilian JR; Plooy A; Carroll TJ
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(4):509-26. PubMed ID: 14999437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Catching oriented objects.
Hermens F; Gielen S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Sep; 114(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 12927341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tau and kappa in interception - how perceptual spatiotemporal interrelations affect movements.
Schroeger A; Raab M; Cañal-Bruland R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1925-1943. PubMed ID: 35705842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory information for spatial location and pitch-height correspondence support young infants' perception of object persistence.
Tham DSY; Rees A; Bremner JG; Slater A; Johnson S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Feb; 178():341-351. PubMed ID: 30139621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial distances affect temporal prediction and interception.
Schroeger A; Grießbach E; Raab M; Cañal-Bruland R
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15786. PubMed ID: 36138102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective control in catching: the persistent Angle-of-approach effect in lateral interception.
Ledouit S; Casanova R; Zaal FT; Bootsma RJ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80827. PubMed ID: 24278324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Saccades to remembered targets: the effects of smooth pursuit and illusory stimulus motion.
Zivotofsky AZ; Rottach KG; Averbuch-Heller L; Kori AA; Thomas CW; Dell'Osso LF; Leigh RJ
J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3617-32. PubMed ID: 8985862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: evidence for spatial prediction.
Russo M; Cesqui B; La Scaleia B; Ceccarelli F; Maselli A; Moscatelli A; Zago M; Lacquaniti F; d'Avella A
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 118(4):2421-2434. PubMed ID: 28768737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.
La Scaleia B; Lacquaniti F; Zago M
J Physiol; 2019 Apr; 597(7):2021-2043. PubMed ID: 30644996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the combination of different pitches and the absence of pitch type information influence timing control during batting in baseball?
Kidokoro S; Matsuzaki Y; Akagi R
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230385. PubMed ID: 32182276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response orientation modulates pitch-space relationships: the ROMPR effect.
Klapman SF; Munn JT; Wilbiks JMP
Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2197-2212. PubMed ID: 32729056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intercepting Moving Objects During Self-Motion.
Lenoir M; Musch E; Janssens M; Thiery E; Uyttenhove J
J Mot Behav; 1999 Mar; 31(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 11177619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of areas MT+/V5 and SPOC in spatial and temporal control of manual interception: an rTMS study.
Dessing JC; Vesia M; Crawford JD
Front Behav Neurosci; 2013; 7():15. PubMed ID: 23468002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory pitch glides influence time-to-contact judgements of visual stimuli.
King C; Prime SL
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):1907-1917. PubMed ID: 31104086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
