These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 341808)

  • 1. Comparison of Andersen eight-stage and two-stage viable air samplers.
    Curtis SE; Balsbaugh RK; Drummond JG
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1978 Jan; 35(1):208-9. PubMed ID: 341808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.
    Furuhashi M; Miyamae T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a simple device for bacteriological sampling of respirator-generated aerosols.
    Ryan KJ; Mihalyi SF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Feb; 5(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 403199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two biological aerosol sampling methods.
    Zimmerman NJ; Reist PC; Turner AG
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Jan; 53(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 3548593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The assessment of aerosol concentration by means of the Andersen sampler.
    Peto S; Powell EO
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1970 Sep; 33(3):582-98. PubMed ID: 4923566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of sunlight on bacterial survival in transparent air samplers.
    Fedorak PM; Westlake WS
    Can J Microbiol; 1978 May; 24(5):618-9. PubMed ID: 350365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of portable air samplers for monitoring airborne culturable bacteria.
    Mehta SK; Bell-Robinson DM; Groves TO; Stetzenbach LD; Pierson DL
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 11192219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of methods for quantitative determinations of airborne bacteria and evaluation of total viable counts.
    Lundholm IM
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Jul; 44(1):179-83. PubMed ID: 6751223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure of workers to airborne microorganisms in open-air swine houses.
    Chang CW; Chung H; Huang CF; Su HJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 67(1):155-61. PubMed ID: 11133440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Method of determination of general air contamination by microbes].
    Kotenok IaF; Gavrilov OG
    Gig Sanit; 1993 May; (5):71-2. PubMed ID: 8063178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between viable bacteria and air pollutants in an urban atmosphere.
    Lee RE; Harris K; Akland G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1973 Apr; 34(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 4124862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbial investigation of the air in an apartment building.
    Simard C; Trudel M; Paquette G; Payment P
    J Hyg (Lond); 1983 Oct; 91(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 6358346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation and application of methods for enumerating heterotrophs and Escherichia coli in the air within piggery sheds.
    Chinivasagam HN; Blackall PJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(5):1137-45. PubMed ID: 15836483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A modification of the Andersen sampler for use in occupied environments.
    Lidwell OM; Noble WC
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1965 Aug; 28(2):280-2. PubMed ID: 5317979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved large-volume sampler for the collection of bacterial cells from aerosol.
    White LA; Hadley DJ; Davids DE; Naylor R
    Appl Microbiol; 1975 Mar; 29(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 803820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Air hygiene in a pullet house: effects of air filtration on aerial pollutants measured in vivo and in vitro.
    Wathes CM; Johnson HE; Carpenter GA
    Br Poult Sci; 1991 Mar; 32(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 1904789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precision of the all-glass impinger and the andersen microbial impactor for air sampling in solid-waste handling facilities.
    Lembke LL; Kniseley RN; van Nostrand RC; Hale MD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Aug; 42(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 7025757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enumeration and identification of airborne viable mould propagules in houses. A field comparison of selected techniques.
    Verhoeff AP; van Wijnen JH; Boleij JS; Brunekreef B; van Reenen-Hoekstra ES; Samson RA
    Allergy; 1990 May; 45(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 2382792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.
    Mehta SK; Mishra SK; Pierson DL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 May; 62(5):1835-8. PubMed ID: 11536729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.