These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34181619)

  • 1. Decision-Making in Adult Cranial Vault Reconstruction.
    Brichacek M; Antonyshyn O; Edwards G; Mainprize JG; da Costa L
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 148(1):109e-121e. PubMed ID: 34181619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cranial Bone Graft Donor Site Reconstruction.
    Çelik M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 28(1):180-181. PubMed ID: 27893560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adult Cranioplasty.
    Pasick CM; Margetis K; Santiago GF; Gordon C; Taub PJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):2138-2143. PubMed ID: 31478955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study on Methods of Cranial Reconstruction.
    Iaccarino C; Viaroli E; Fricia M; Serchi E; Poli T; Servadei F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12):2375-8. PubMed ID: 26253012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Outcomes Comparison Between Autologous and Alloplastic Cranioplasty in the Pediatric Population.
    Fu KJ; Barr RM; Kerr ML; Shah MN; Fletcher SA; Sandberg DI; Teichgraeber JF; Greives MR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 27035597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Syndrome of the Trephined: Quantitative Functional Improvement after Large Cranial Vault Reconstruction.
    Tarr JT; Hagan M; Zhang B; Tanna N; Andrews BT; Lee JC; Bradley JP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jun; 145(6):1486-1494. PubMed ID: 32195855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of decompressive craniectomy defects: modern military treatment strategies.
    Tantawi D; Armonda R; Valerio I; Kumar AR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2042-5. PubMed ID: 23154344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cranioplasty Using a Mixture of Biologic and Nonbiologic Agents.
    Arnaoutakis D; Bahrami A; Cohn JE; Smith JE
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 20(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 29098278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-Term Characterization of Cranial Defects After Surgical Correction for Single-Suture Craniosynostosis.
    Skolnick GB; Murthy S; Patel KB; Huang Z; Naidoo SD; Ju T; Smyth MD; Woo AS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6):679-685. PubMed ID: 31082848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Autogenous Bone Cranioplasty: Review of a 42-Year Experience by a Single Surgeon.
    Cabbad NC; Stalder MW; Arroyave A; Wolfe EM; Wolfe SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jun; 143(6):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 31136489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
    Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Materials and techniques for osseous skull reconstruction.
    Spetzger U; Vougioukas V; Schipper J
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2010 Apr; 19(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 20166839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Custom porous polyethylene implants for large-scale pediatric skull reconstruction: early outcomes.
    Lin AY; Kinsella CR; Rottgers SA; Smith DM; Grunwaldt LJ; Cooper GM; Losee JE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 22337376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exchange cranioplasty using autologous calvarial particulate bone graft effectively repairs large cranial defects.
    Rogers GF; Greene AK; Mulliken JB; Proctor MR; Ridgway EB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Apr; 127(4):1631-1642. PubMed ID: 21460669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Classification of autogenous skull grafts in cranial reconstruction.
    Hunter PD; Pelofsky S
    J Craniomaxillofac Trauma; 1995; 1(4):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcomes in cranioplasty: risk factors and choice of reconstructive material.
    Reddy S; Khalifian S; Flores JM; Bellamy J; Manson PN; Rodriguez ED; Dorafshar AH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Apr; 133(4):864-873. PubMed ID: 24675189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complications in bone grafting.
    Herford AS; Dean JS
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2011 Aug; 23(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 21622007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing for Autogenous, Split Calvarial Bone Graft-based Cranioplasty: Optimizing Reconstruction of Large, Complex Skull Defects.
    Musavi L; Macmillan A; Lopez J; Dorafshar AH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 30507889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of Titanium Mesh Cranioplasty in Pediatric Patients.
    Ma IT; Symon MR; Bristol RE; Beals SP; Joganic EF; Adelson PD; Shafron DH; Singh DJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29049146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of cranial bone defects: a reconstructive algorithm according to defect size.
    Uygur S; Eryilmaz T; Cukurluoglu O; Ozmen S; Yavuzer R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 24(5):1606-9. PubMed ID: 24036736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.