These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34181678)

  • 1. Bartlett-corrected tests for varying precision beta regressions with application to environmental biometrics.
    Guedes AC; Cribari-Neto F; Espinheira PL
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253349. PubMed ID: 34181678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bartlett and Bartlett-type corrections in heteroscedastic symmetric nonlinear regression models.
    Araújo MC; Cysneiros AHMA; Cysneiros M
    An Acad Bras Cienc; 2022; 94(suppl 3):e20200568. PubMed ID: 36417597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modified likelihood ratio tests for unit gamma regressions.
    Guedes AC; Cribari-Neto F; Espinheira PL
    J Appl Stat; 2020; 47(9):1562-1586. PubMed ID: 35707584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On power and sample size calculations for likelihood ratio tests in generalized linear models.
    Shieh G
    Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1192-6. PubMed ID: 11129478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bartlett-type corrections and bootstrap adjustments of likelihood-based inference methods for network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Maruo K; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29250816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjusted closed-form confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis with a small number of studies.
    Kojima M
    Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):457-469. PubMed ID: 36539211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
    Noma H
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximate interval estimation of the difference in binomial parameters: correction for skewness and extension to multiple tables.
    Gart JJ; Nam JM
    Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):637-43. PubMed ID: 2242407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling.
    Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 35014004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A two-sample test for stochastic ordering with interval-censored data.
    Petroni GR; Wolfe RA
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 8086617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing approaches for overdispersion in poisson regression versus the generalized poisson model.
    Yang Z; Hardin JW; Addy CL; Vuong QH
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):565-84. PubMed ID: 17638291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirically Corrected Rescaled Statistics for SEM with Small N and Large p.
    Yuan KH; Yang M; Jiang G
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(6):673-698. PubMed ID: 28891682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
    Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple comparisons for analyzing dichotomous response.
    Piegorsch WW
    Biometrics; 1991 Mar; 47(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 2049512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing nonlinear regression parameters under heteroscedastic, normally distributed errors.
    Kimura DK
    Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):697-708. PubMed ID: 2242410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculating sample size for studies with expected all-or-none nonadherence and selection bias.
    Shardell MD; El-Kamary SS
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):635-9. PubMed ID: 18759830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A likelihood-based method for testing for nonstochastic variation of diversification rates in phylogenies.
    McConway KJ; Sims HJ
    Evolution; 2004 Jan; 58(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 15058715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interval estimation and significance testing for cyclic trends in seasonality studies.
    Nam JM
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1411-7. PubMed ID: 8589231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.