These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34181681)

  • 1. The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation.
    Koltun V; Hafner D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253397. PubMed ID: 34181681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Pagerank-Index: Going beyond Citation Counts in Quantifying Scientific Impact of Researchers.
    Senanayake U; Piraveenan M; Zomaya A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134794. PubMed ID: 26288312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taking Advantage of Citation Measures of Scholarly Impact: Hip Hip h Index!
    Ruscio J
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Nov; 11(6):905-908. PubMed ID: 27899734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Credit and Priority in Scientific Discovery: A Scientist's Perspective.
    Flier JS
    Perspect Biol Med; 2019; 62(2):189-215. PubMed ID: 31281118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting scholars' scientific impact.
    Mazloumian A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49246. PubMed ID: 23185311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines.
    Ioannidis JP; Klavans R; Boyack KW
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Jul; 14(7):e1002501. PubMed ID: 27367269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Profit (p)-index: the degree to which authors profit from co-authors.
    Aziz NA; Rozing MP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e59814. PubMed ID: 23573211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of scientometric parameters for the evaluation of scientific contributions.
    Klaić B
    Coll Antropol; 1999 Dec; 23(2):751-70. PubMed ID: 10646253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Impact factor and/or Hirsch index?].
    Gracza T; Somoskövi I
    Orv Hetil; 2007 May; 148(18):849-52. PubMed ID: 17468068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collective credit allocation in science.
    Shen HW; Barabási AL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(34):12325-30. PubMed ID: 25114238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diversity in science prizes: why is progress so slow?
    Nature; 2022 Jun; 606(7914):433-434. PubMed ID: 35705824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cooperation or false authorship? Scientometric investigations on the connections between the number of authors, the scientific cooperation and the effectivity].
    Marton J; Balo S
    Orv Hetil; 2007 Mar; 148(12):559-62. PubMed ID: 17444022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific output quality of 40 globally top-ranked medical researchers in the field of osteoporosis.
    Pluskiewicz W; Drozdzowska B; Adamczyk P; Noga K
    Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Mar; 13(1):35. PubMed ID: 29582219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical regularities in the rank-citation profile of scientists.
    Petersen AM; Stanley HE; Succi S
    Sci Rep; 2011; 1():181. PubMed ID: 22355696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alzheimer's disease research: scientific productivity and impact of the top 100 investigators in the field.
    Sorensen AA
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2009; 16(3):451-65. PubMed ID: 19221406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guest authors or ghost inventors? Inventorship and authorship attribution in academic science.
    Lissoni F; Montobbio F
    Eval Rev; 2015 Feb; 39(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 24408905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring Scientific Impact With the h-Index: A Primer for Pathologists.
    Schreiber WE; Giustini DM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Feb; 151(3):286-291. PubMed ID: 30346467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fair ranking of researchers and research teams.
    Vavryčuk V
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195509. PubMed ID: 29621316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions.
    Gross K; Bergstrom CT
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000065. PubMed ID: 30601806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Science.
    Usmani AM; Meo SA
    Sudan J Paediatr; 2011; 11(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 27493300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.