These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34181721)

  • 1. Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains.
    Barsoum HA; ElSayed HS; El Sharaby FA; Palomo JM; Mostafa YA
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):441-448. PubMed ID: 34181721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study.
    Hashemzadeh H; Soleimani M; Golbar M; Dehghani Soltani A; Mirmalek SP
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100601. PubMed ID: 34866026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
    Bokas J; Woods M
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthodontic space closure in sliding mechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sebastian B; Bhuvaraghan A; Thiruvenkatachari B
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):210-225. PubMed ID: 34609513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs.
    Santos AC; Tortamano A; Naccarato SR; Dominguez-Rodriguez GC; Vigorito JW
    Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17384855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leptin levels in gingival crevicular fluid during canine retraction: in vivo comparative study.
    Sar SK; Shetty D; Kumar P; Juneja S; Sharma P
    J Orthod; 2019 Mar; 46(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31056072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [An in vitro study of the stretching time-associated force loss generated by elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs].
    Shaddud AN; Kosyreva TF
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2018; 97(6):13-16. PubMed ID: 30589418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of elastic memory chains versus nickel-titanium coil springs in canine retraction: A two-center split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Khanemasjedi M; Moradinejad M; Javidi P; Niknam O; Jahromi NH; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):561-574. PubMed ID: 29153282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the Amount of Tooth Movement and Root Resorption during Canine Retraction with Friction versus Frictionless Mechanics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Makhlouf M; Aboul-Ezz A; Fayed MS; Hafez H
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 6(2):384-388. PubMed ID: 29531610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Force degradation of two orthodontic accessories analyzed in vivo and in vitro.
    Yang L; Lv C; Li X; Feng J
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):1001. PubMed ID: 38097980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction:
    da C Monini A; Gandini LG; Vianna AP; Martins RP; Jacob HB
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Jul; 89(4):559-565. PubMed ID: 30741577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Holographic analysis of the initial canine displacement produced by four different retraction springs.
    Kumar YM; Ravindran NS; Balasubramaniam MR
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):368-72. PubMed ID: 19216610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of low frequency vibration on the rate of canine retraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Abd ElMotaleb MA; El-Beialy AR; El-Sharaby FA; ElDakroury AE; Eid AA
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):7952. PubMed ID: 38575623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction.
    Sueri MY; Turk T
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 17090165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Using Self-ligating Brackets on Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth Design Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hassan SE; Hajeer MY; Alali OH; Kaddah AS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 17(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 27484605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
    Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing patient-centered outcomes and efficiency of space closure between nickel-titanium closed-coil springs and elastomeric power chains during orthodontic treatment.
    Badran SA; Al-Zaben JM; Al-Taie LM; Tbeishi H; Al-Omiri MK
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Jul; 92(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 35348615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant-supported canine retraction using different reactivation intervals of elastomeric chains: A CBCT-based split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Elsayed HS; El-Beialy AR; Alshazly R; Almohammad A; Elazab K; El-Badawy R; Palomo JM; Mostafa YA
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(5):e2321166. PubMed ID: 37937679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.