These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34182426)

  • 21. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetic toxicology in silico protocol.
    Hasselgren C; Ahlberg E; Akahori Y; Amberg A; Anger LT; Atienzar F; Auerbach S; Beilke L; Bellion P; Benigni R; Bercu J; Booth ED; Bower D; Brigo A; Cammerer Z; Cronin MTD; Crooks I; Cross KP; Custer L; Dobo K; Doktorova T; Faulkner D; Ford KA; Fortin MC; Frericks M; Gad-McDonald SE; Gellatly N; Gerets H; Gervais V; Glowienke S; Van Gompel J; Harvey JS; Hillegass J; Honma M; Hsieh JH; Hsu CW; Barton-Maclaren TS; Johnson C; Jolly R; Jones D; Kemper R; Kenyon MO; Kruhlak NL; Kulkarni SA; Kümmerer K; Leavitt P; Masten S; Miller S; Moudgal C; Muster W; Paulino A; Lo Piparo E; Powley M; Quigley DP; Reddy MV; Richarz AN; Schilter B; Snyder RD; Stavitskaya L; Stidl R; Szabo DT; Teasdale A; Tice RR; Trejo-Martin A; Vuorinen A; Wall BA; Watts P; White AT; Wichard J; Witt KL; Woolley A; Woolley D; Zwickl C; Myatt GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Oct; 107():104403. PubMed ID: 31195068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing the impact of expert knowledge on ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions. Is expert review still needed?
    Jayasekara PS; Skanchy SK; Kim MT; Kumaran G; Mugabe BE; Woodard LE; Yang J; Zych AJ; Kruhlak NL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105006. PubMed ID: 34273441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of flavouring substances of genotoxic concern present in e-cigarette refills.
    Barhdadi S; Mertens B; Van Bossuyt M; Van De Maele J; Anthonissen R; Canfyn M; Courselle P; Rogiers V; Deconinck E; Vanhaecke T
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2021 Jan; 147():111864. PubMed ID: 33217530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk assessment of food-contact materials: past experience and future challenges.
    Barlow SM
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2009 Dec; 26(12):1526-33. PubMed ID: 19809897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in a better European regulation of food contact materials - some proposals.
    Grob K
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2019 Dec; 36(12):1895-1902. PubMed ID: 31479392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances.
    Simon-Hettich B; Rothfuss A; Steger-Hartmann T
    Toxicology; 2006 Jul; 224(1-2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16707203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Advantages of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography for comprehensive analysis of potential migrants from food contact materials.
    Biedermann M; Grob K
    Anal Chim Acta; 2019 May; 1057():11-17. PubMed ID: 30832909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prioritization before risk assessment: The viability of uncertain data on food contact materials.
    Pieke EN; Granby K; Teste B; Smedsgaard J; Rivière G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Aug; 97():134-143. PubMed ID: 29932981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Toward regulatory acceptance and improving the prediction confidence of in silico approaches: a case study of genotoxicity.
    Tcheremenskaia O; Benigni R
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):987-1005. PubMed ID: 34078212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials II.
    Galbiati E; Tietz T; Zellmer S; Merkel S
    EFSA J; 2022 May; 20(Suppl 1):e200408. PubMed ID: 35634565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Value and limitation of structure-based profilers to characterize developmental and reproductive toxicity potential.
    Manganelli S; Schilter B; Scholz G; Benfenati E; Lo Piparo E
    Arch Toxicol; 2020 Mar; 94(3):939-954. PubMed ID: 32100055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Suitability of the Ames test to characterise genotoxicity of food contact material migrates.
    Rainer B; Pinter E; Czerny T; Riegel E; Kirchnawy C; Marin-Kuan M; Schilter B; Tacker M
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2018 Nov; 35(11):2230-2243. PubMed ID: 30257137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of in silico models for prediction of mutagenicity.
    Bakhtyari NG; Raitano G; Benfenati E; Martin T; Young D
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2013; 31(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 23534394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A novel safety assessment strategy for non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) in carton food contact materials.
    Koster S; Rennen M; Leeman W; Houben G; Muilwijk B; van Acker F; Krul L
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2014; 31(3):422-43. PubMed ID: 24237267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Value and limitation of
    Schilter B; Burnett K; Eskes C; Geurts L; Jacquet M; Kirchnawy C; Oldring P; Pieper G; Pinter E; Tacker M; Traussnig H; Van Herwijnen P; Boobis A
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2019 Dec; 36(12):1903-1936. PubMed ID: 31550212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technological challenges of addressing new and more complex migrating products from novel food packaging materials.
    Munro IC; Haighton LA; Lynch BS; Tafazoli S
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2009 Dec; 26(12):1534-46. PubMed ID: 19938328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A vision for safer food contact materials: Public health concerns as drivers for improved testing.
    Muncke J; Andersson AM; Backhaus T; Belcher SM; Boucher JM; Carney Almroth B; Collins TJ; Geueke B; Groh KJ; Heindel JJ; von Hippel FA; Legler J; Maffini MV; Martin OV; Peterson Myers J; Nadal A; Nerin C; Soto AM; Trasande L; Vandenberg LN; Wagner M; Zimmermann L; Thomas Zoeller R; Scheringer M
    Environ Int; 2023 Oct; 180():108161. PubMed ID: 37758599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Integration of structure-activity relationship and artificial intelligence systems to improve in silico prediction of ames test mutagenicity.
    Mazzatorta P; Tran LA; Schilter B; Grigorov M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17238246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In silico prediction of chromosome damage: comparison of three (Q)SAR models.
    Morita T; Shigeta Y; Kawamura T; Fujita Y; Honda H; Honma M
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 30085209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.