219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34182933)
1. AutoFlow® versus volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic gynecological surgery using LMA® ProSeal™: a randomized controlled trial.
Nakanishi T; Sakamoto S; Yoshimura M; Toriumi T
BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Jun; 21(1):181. PubMed ID: 34182933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation in obese patients during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position].
Toker MK; Altıparmak B; Uysal Aİ; Demirbilek SG
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2019; 69(6):553-560. PubMed ID: 31836201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing leak pressure of LMA
Chaki T; Koizumi M; Tachibana S; Matsumoto T; Kumagai T; Hashimoto Y; Yamakage M
Can J Anaesth; 2024 Jan; 71(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 38017196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Respiratory dynamics and dead space to tidal volume ratio of volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation during prolonged gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
Lian M; Zhao X; Wang H; Chen L; Li S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3605-3613. PubMed ID: 28039643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of volume controlled vs. pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with laryngeal mask airway.
Wang P; Zhao S; Gao Z; Hu J; Lu Y; Chen J
BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):69. PubMed ID: 33685395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of volume-controlled, pressure-controlled, and pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation during robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the Trendelenburg position.
Lee JM; Lee SK; Rhim CC; Seo KH; Han M; Kim SY; Park EY
Int J Med Sci; 2020; 17(17):2728-2734. PubMed ID: 33162800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed mode improves bronchial mucus transport velocity in patients during laparoscopic surgery for gynecological oncology: a randomized controlled study.
Deng C; Xu T; Wang XK; Gu DF
BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):379. PubMed ID: 37986138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation volume guaranteed during laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position.
Assad OM; El Sayed AA; Khalil MA
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Nov; 34():55-61. PubMed ID: 27687346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressure versus volume-controlled ventilation with a laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients.
Keidan I; Berkenstadt H; Segal E; Perel A
Paediatr Anaesth; 2001 Nov; 11(6):691-4. PubMed ID: 11696145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. LMA® protector™ in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries: a multicenter prospective observational study.
Liu Y; Song Y; Wang M; Yang M; Shen H; Wang Z; Chen L; Yang J; Gong S; Yu Y; Shi Z; Zhang W; Zou X; Sun X; Wang Y; Fu Q; Cao J; Mi W
BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):318. PubMed ID: 34930137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gastric banding in morbidly obese patients.
De Baerdemaeker LE; Van der Herten C; Gillardin JM; Pattyn P; Mortier EP; Szegedi LL
Obes Surg; 2008 Jun; 18(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 18317856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery].
Shi YB; Zuo MZ; Du XH; Yu Z
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 93(25):1978-80. PubMed ID: 24169248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
Oğurlu M; Küçük M; Bilgin F; Sizlan A; Yanarateş O; Eksert S; Karaşahin E; Coşar A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 20303833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between three second generation supraglottic airway devices during laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients.
Kumar A; Sinha C; Kumar N; Kumar A; Kumar B; Kumar A; Kumar R
Paediatr Anaesth; 2022 Jul; 32(7):843-850. PubMed ID: 35338764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons of Pressure-controlled Ventilation with Volume Guarantee and Volume-controlled 1:1 Equal Ratio Ventilation on Oxygenation and Respiratory Mechanics during Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: a Randomized-controlled Trial.
Kim MS; Soh S; Kim SY; Song MS; Park JH
Int J Med Sci; 2018; 15(13):1522-1529. PubMed ID: 30443174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial.
Mishra SK; Sivaraman B; Balachander H; Naggappa M; Parida S; Bhat RR; Yuvaraj K
Anesth Essays Res; 2015; 9(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 26712973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Beleña JM; Núñez M; Anta D; Carnero M; Gracia JL; Ayala JL; Alvarez R; Yuste J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation on lung protection in obese patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
Xu L; Shen J; Yan M
J Anesth; 2017 Oct; 31(5):651-656. PubMed ID: 28497325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial.
Ye Q; Wu D; Fang W; Wong GTC; Lu Y
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):136. PubMed ID: 32493213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
