These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34183047)

  • 1. ORFograph: search for novel insecticidal protein genes in genomic and metagenomic assembly graphs.
    Dvorkina T; Bankevich A; Sorokin A; Yang F; Adu-Oppong B; Williams R; Turner K; Pevzner PA
    Microbiome; 2021 Jun; 9(1):149. PubMed ID: 34183047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BiosyntheticSPAdes: reconstructing biosynthetic gene clusters from assembly graphs.
    Meleshko D; Mohimani H; Tracanna V; Hajirasouliha I; Medema MH; Korobeynikov A; Pevzner PA
    Genome Res; 2019 Aug; 29(8):1352-1362. PubMed ID: 31160374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GraphBin: refined binning of metagenomic contigs using assembly graphs.
    Mallawaarachchi V; Wickramarachchi A; Lin Y
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(11):3307-3313. PubMed ID: 32167528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accurate Binning of Metagenomic Contigs Using Composition, Coverage, and Assembly Graphs.
    Mallawaarachchi V; Lin Y
    J Comput Biol; 2022 Dec; 29(12):1357-1376. PubMed ID: 36367700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. METAMVGL: a multi-view graph-based metagenomic contig binning algorithm by integrating assembly and paired-end graphs.
    Zhang Z; Zhang L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 22(Suppl 10):378. PubMed ID: 34294039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stitching gene fragments with a network matching algorithm improves gene assembly for metagenomics.
    Wu YW; Rho M; Doak TG; Ye Y
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 28(18):i363-i369. PubMed ID: 22962453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3CAC: improving the classification of phages and plasmids in metagenomic assemblies using assembly graphs.
    Pu L; Shamir R
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(Suppl_2):ii56-ii61. PubMed ID: 36124804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Graph mining for next generation sequencing: leveraging the assembly graph for biological insights.
    Warnke-Sommer J; Ali H
    BMC Genomics; 2016 May; 17():340. PubMed ID: 27154001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binnacle: Using Scaffolds to Improve the Contiguity and Quality of Metagenomic Bins.
    Muralidharan HS; Shah N; Meisel JS; Pop M
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():638561. PubMed ID: 33717033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring variation-aware contig graphs for (comparative) metagenomics using MaryGold.
    Nijkamp JF; Pop M; Reinders MJ; de Ridder D
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Nov; 29(22):2826-34. PubMed ID: 24058058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future.
    Lacey LA; Grzywacz D; Shapiro-Ilan DI; Frutos R; Brownbridge M; Goettel MS
    J Invertebr Pathol; 2015 Nov; 132():1-41. PubMed ID: 26225455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of short read metagenomic assembly.
    Charuvaka A; Rangwala H
    BMC Genomics; 2011; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S8. PubMed ID: 21989307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving metagenomic binning results with overlapped bins using assembly graphs.
    Mallawaarachchi VG; Wickramarachchi AS; Lin Y
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2021 May; 16(1):3. PubMed ID: 33947431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CoMet: a workflow using contig coverage and composition for binning a metagenomic sample with high precision.
    Herath D; Tang SL; Tandon K; Ackland D; Halgamuge SK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):571. PubMed ID: 29297295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved assemblies using a source-agnostic pipeline for MetaGenomic Assembly by Merging (MeGAMerge) of contigs.
    Scholz M; Lo CC; Chain PS
    Sci Rep; 2014 Oct; 4():6480. PubMed ID: 25270300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benchmarking of de novo assembly algorithms for Nanopore data reveals optimal performance of OLC approaches.
    Cherukuri Y; Janga SC
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):507. PubMed ID: 27556636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A scalable assembly-free variable selection algorithm for biomarker discovery from metagenomes.
    Gkanogiannis A; Gazut S; Salanoubat M; Kanj S; Brüls T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):311. PubMed ID: 27542753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MetaVelvet-DL: a MetaVelvet deep learning extension for de novo metagenome assembly.
    Liang KC; Sakakibara Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jun; 22(Suppl 6):427. PubMed ID: 34078257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graph-Based Approaches Significantly Improve the Recovery of Antibiotic Resistance Genes From Complex Metagenomic Datasets.
    Shafranskaya D; Chori A; Korobeynikov A
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():714836. PubMed ID: 34690959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.