307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34183255)
1. The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis.
Avolio PP; Lughezzani G; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Uleri A; Frego N; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Saita A; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM
Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):832.e1-832.e7. PubMed ID: 34183255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical utility of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy in patients with lower suspicion lesions on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Lokeshwar SD; Nguyen J; Rahman SN; Khajir G; Ho R; Ghabili K; Leapman MS; Weinreb JC; Sprenkle PC
Urol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):407.e21-407.e27. PubMed ID: 35811206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Microultrasound in Patients with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer at Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Single-institutional Prospective Study.
Lughezzani G; Maffei D; Saita A; Paciotti M; Diana P; Buffi NM; Colombo P; Elefante GM; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Guazzoni G; Casale P
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):1019-1026. PubMed ID: 33069624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PI-RADS 3 lesions: Does the association of the lesion volume with the prostate-specific antigen density matter in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer?
Rico L; Blas L; Vitagliano G; Contreras P; Rios Pita H; Ameri C
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):431.e9-431.e13. PubMed ID: 33221259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of microUltrasound at MRI-guided confirmatory biopsy in patients under active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Maffei D; Fasulo V; Avolio PP; Saitta C; Paciotti M; De Carne F; Colombo P; Pasini L; De Zorzi SZ; Saita A; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Guazzoni GF; Casale P; Buffi NM; Lughezzani G
Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(9):886-895. PubMed ID: 36960788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-MRI transrectal micro-ultrasonography of transition zone PI-RADS > 2 lesions for biopsy guidance.
Cornud F; Lefevre A; Camparo P; Barat M; Dumonceau O; Galiano M; Flam T; Soyer P; Barral M
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7504-7512. PubMed ID: 35451606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The utility of in-bore multiparametric magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in men with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance-ultrasound software-based fusion targeted biopsy.
Perrin A; Venderink W; Patak MA; Möckel C; Fehr JL; Jichlinski P; Porcellini B; Lucca I; Futterer J; Valerio M
Urol Oncol; 2021 May; 39(5):297.e9-297.e16. PubMed ID: 33341358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The benefit of adopting Microultrasound in the prostate cancer imaging pathway: A lesion-by-lesion analysis: Biopsies prostatiques guidée par micro-échographie, quel bénéfice ? Une analyse lésion par lésion.
Martel P; Rakauskas A; Dagher J; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
Prog Urol; 2022 Jun; 32(6S1):6S26-6S32. PubMed ID: 36719643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI- and microultrasound-targeted biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients with a PI-RADS 5 lesion: a single-institutional study.
Avolio PP; Fasulo V; Sanchez-Salas R; Maffei D; Frego N; Lazzeri M; Paciotti M; Saita A; Hurle R; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM; Lughezzani G
World J Urol; 2023 Sep; 41(9):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 37418017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive clinical features for negative histopathology of MRI/Ultrasound-fusion-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high likelihood of cancer at prostate MRI: Analysis from a urologic outpatient clinic1.
Apfelbeck M; Pfitzinger P; Bischoff R; Rath L; Buchner A; Mumm JN; Schlenker B; Stief CG; Chaloupka M; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 76(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 33337358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies.
Rodríguez Socarrás ME; Gomez Rivas J; Cuadros Rivera V; Reinoso Elbers J; Llanes González L; Michel Mercado I; Fernandez Del Alamo J; Juarez Del Dago P; Sancha FG
J Urol; 2020 Oct; 204(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 32314932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Review of the accuracy of multi-parametric MRI prostate in detecting prostate cancer within a local reporting service.
Tsai WC; Field L; Stewart S; Schultz M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jun; 64(3):379-384. PubMed ID: 32243728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.
Castellucci R; Linares Quevedo AI; Sánchez Gómez FJ; Díez Rodríguez J; Cogorno L; Cogollos Acuña I; Salmerón Béliz I; Muñoz Fernández de Legaría M; Martínez Piñeiro L
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):589-595. PubMed ID: 29094851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical significance of prostate cancer identified by transperineal standard template biopsy in men with nonsuspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Dahl DM; Wu S; Lin SX; Hu M; Barney AA; Kim MM; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL
Urol Oncol; 2024 Feb; 42(2):28.e21-28.e28. PubMed ID: 38182499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI-directed high-frequency (29MhZ) TRUS-guided biopsies: initial results of a single-center study.
Cornud F; Lefevre A; Flam T; Dumonceau O; Galiano M; Soyer P; Camparo P; Barral M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4838-4846. PubMed ID: 32350662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by micro-ultrasound-informed systematic biopsy during MRI/micro-ultrasound fusion biopsy.
Wang B; Broomfield S; Martín AM; Albers P; Fung C; Kinnaird A
Can Urol Assoc J; 2023 Apr; 17(4):117-120. PubMed ID: 36486174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of initial and second opinion reads of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate for transperineal template-guided biopsies with MRI-Ultrasound fusion.
Ecke TH; Schwaiger D; Nesterov G; Koswig S; Selinski S; Barrett T; Gnanapragasam V; Koch S; Hallmann S
Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):781.e1-781.e7. PubMed ID: 33563540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinico-radiological characteristic-based machine learning in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies of PI-RADS 3 lesions with dual validation.
Kan Y; Zhang Q; Hao J; Wang W; Zhuang J; Gao J; Huang H; Liang J; Marra G; Calleris G; Oderda M; Zhao X; Gontero P; Guo H
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6274-6284. PubMed ID: 32524222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
