These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3418361)

  • 1. Sample size determination in studies with matched pairs.
    Fleiss JL; Levin B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1988; 41(8):727-30. PubMed ID: 3418361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size and power for pair-matched case-control studies.
    Connett JE; Smith JA; McHugh RB
    Stat Med; 1987; 6(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 3576017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power and sample size evaluation for the McNemar test with application to matched case-control studies.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 1992 Jun; 11(9):1239-51. PubMed ID: 1509223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choosing the number of controls in a matched case-control study, some sample size, power and efficiency considerations.
    Taylor JM
    Stat Med; 1986; 5(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 3961313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size and power for case-control studies when exposures are continuous.
    Lubin JH; Gail MH; Ershow AG
    Stat Med; 1988 Mar; 7(3):363-76. PubMed ID: 3358016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical appraisal of the exposure-potential restriction rule.
    Poole C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1987 Feb; 125(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 3544815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Case-control studies: a sequential approach.
    O'Neill RT; Anello C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1978 Nov; 108(5):415-24. PubMed ID: 727211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In defense of matching.
    Karon JM; Kupper LL
    Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Nov; 116(5):852-66. PubMed ID: 7148808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of measurement error in exposure for the sample sizes of case-control studies.
    McKeown-Eyssen GE; Tibshirani R
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Feb; 139(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 8109576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Note on interval estimation of the difference between proportions from correlated series.
    Hsieh CC
    Stat Med; 1985; 4(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3992071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A test of interaction between matching variables and risk factors in 2 matched samples].
    Ravaud JF; Moreau T
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1986; 34(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 2942987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-stage sampling for etiologic studies. Sample size and power.
    Schaubel D; Hanley J; Collet JP; Bolvin JF; Sharpe C; Morrison HI; Mao Y
    Am J Epidemiol; 1997 Sep; 146(5):450-8. PubMed ID: 9290505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of one-sample two-sided sequential t-tests for application in epidemiological studies.
    van der Tweel I; Kaaks R; van Noord PA
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2781-95. PubMed ID: 8981686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Random-digit dialing for control selection in childhood cancer studies: the geographic proximity and demographics within matched sets.
    Sakkinen PA; Severson RK; Ross JA; Robison LL
    Am J Public Health; 1995 Apr; 85(4):555-7. PubMed ID: 7702122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the use of concordant pairs in matched case-control studies.
    Liang KY; Zeger SL
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1145-56. PubMed ID: 3233251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of significant relative risks and optimal sampling procedures in prospective and retrospective comparative studies of various sizes.
    Walter SD
    Am J Epidemiol; 1977 Apr; 105(4):387-97. PubMed ID: 848486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attributable risk ratio estimation from matched-pairs case-control data.
    Kuritz SJ; Landis JR
    Am J Epidemiol; 1987 Feb; 125(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 3812438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample sizes for individually matched case-control studies: a group sequential approach.
    Pasternack BS; Shore RE
    Am J Epidemiol; 1982 May; 115(5):778-84. PubMed ID: 7081206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large sample formulae for the expected number of matches in a category matched design.
    Walter SD
    Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 7407316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of odds ratio regression models for assessing familial aggregation from case-control studies.
    Liang KY; Beaty TH; Cohen BH
    Am J Epidemiol; 1986 Oct; 124(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 3752061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.