Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34184127)

  • 1. Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Surov A; Meyer HJ; Pech M; Powerski M; Omari J; Wienke A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Oct; 36(10):2189-2197. PubMed ID: 34184127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in differentiating between benign and metastatic lymph nodes in cases of cholangiocarcinoma.
    Promsorn J; Soontrapa W; Somsap K; Chamadol N; Limpawattana P; Harisinghani M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 30151713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Cannot Predict Histopathological Features and Response to Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
    Surov A; Pech M; Powerski M; Woidacki K; Wienke A
    Dig Dis; 2022; 40(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 33662962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility and reproducibility of T2 mapping and DWI for identifying malignant lymph nodes in rectal cancer.
    Ge YX; Hu SD; Wang Z; Guan RP; Zhou XY; Gao QZ; Yan G
    Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):3347-3354. PubMed ID: 33185752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in primary rectal cancer.
    Cho EY; Kim SH; Yoon JH; Lee Y; Lim YJ; Kim SJ; Baek HJ; Eun CK
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e662-8. PubMed ID: 24016824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta analysis of lymph node metastasis of breast cancer patients: Clinical value of DWI and ADC value.
    Xing H; Song CL; Li WJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1132-7. PubMed ID: 27161063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of 103 Patients with Rectal Adenocarcinoma Identifies the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as an Imaging Marker for Tumor Invasion and Regional Lymph Node Involvement.
    Kargol J; Rudnicki W; Kenig J; Filipowska J; Kaznowska E; Kluz T; Guz W; Łuczyńska E
    Med Sci Monit; 2021 Dec; 27():e934941. PubMed ID: 34871292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.
    Yasui O; Sato M; Kamada A
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2009 Jul; 218(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 19561387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis on rectal cancer by PET-CT computer imaging combined with MRI technology.
    Li F; Hu J; Jiang H; Sun Y
    J Infect Public Health; 2020 Sep; 13(9):1347-1353. PubMed ID: 31289005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Efficiency of Diffusion Sequences and a Clinical Nomogram for Detecting Lymph Node Metastases from Rectal Cancer.
    Wang C; Yu J; Lu M; Li Y; Shi H; Xu Q
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):1287-1295. PubMed ID: 34802905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic value of lymph node metastasis by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer.
    He XQ; Wei LN
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 27072215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Diagnosis value of 3.0 T diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression magnetic resonance for metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer].
    Zhuang XZ; Yu SP; Cui J; Chen CQ; Zhao XJ; Pan BT; Li ZP
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):842-5. PubMed ID: 22116716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) distinguish breast cancer from benign breast findings? A meta-analysis based on 13 847 lesions.
    Surov A; Meyer HJ; Wienke A
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(1):955. PubMed ID: 31615463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apparent diffusion coefficient for lymph node characterization after chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Kim SH; Ryu KH; Yoon JH; Lee Y; Paik JH; Kim SJ; Jung HK; Lee KH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1446-53. PubMed ID: 25425724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Between Malignant and Benign Lesions in the Head and Neck Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Surov A; Meyer HJ; Wienke A
    Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1362. PubMed ID: 31970081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    Rong D; Mao Y; Hu W; Xu S; Wang J; He H; Li S; Zhang R
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2781-2789. PubMed ID: 29404768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of quantitative intravoxel incoherent motion parameters in the preoperative diagnosis of nodal metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma.
    Qiu L; Liu XL; Liu SR; Weng ZP; Chen XQ; Feng YZ; Cai XR; Guo CY
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):1031-9. PubMed ID: 27019309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in discriminating between metastatic and non-metastatic pelvic lymph nodes in endometrial cancer.
    Arian A; Easa AM; Arab-Ahmadi M
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Nov; 61(11):1580-1586. PubMed ID: 32106683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient does not predict therapy response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Surov A; Wienke A; Meyer HJ
    Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():59-67. PubMed ID: 32652460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Metastatic Lymph Nodes of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Suh CH; Choi YJ; Baek JH; Lee JH
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Oct; 39(10):1889-1895. PubMed ID: 30213809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.