These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34184150)
1. Comparing clinical outcomes of macular hole surgeries performed by trainee surgeons using a 3D heads-up display viewing system versus a standard operating microscope. Reddy S; Mallikarjun K; Mohamed A; Mruthyunjaya P; Dave VP; Pappuru RR; Chhablani J; Narayanan R Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug; 41(8):2649-2655. PubMed ID: 34184150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a Three-Dimensional Heads-Up Display Surgical Platform with a Standard Operating Microscope for Macular Surgery. Talcott KE; Adam MK; Sioufi K; Aderman CM; Ali FS; Mellen PL; Garg SJ; Hsu J; Ho AC Ophthalmol Retina; 2019 Mar; 3(3):244-251. PubMed ID: 31014702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS INVERTED FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN A LARGE SERIES OF PATIENTS. Rizzo S; Tartaro R; Barca F; Caporossi T; Bacherini D; Giansanti F Retina; 2018 Sep; 38 Suppl 1():S73-S78. PubMed ID: 29232338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study. Ramtohul P; Parrat E; Denis D; Lorenzi U BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):11. PubMed ID: 31907015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of clinical outcomes between "heads-up" 3D viewing system and conventional microscope in macular hole surgeries: A pilot study. Kumar A; Hasan N; Kakkar P; Mutha V; Karthikeya R; Sundar D; Ravani R Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 66(12):1816-1819. PubMed ID: 30451186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of cognitive workload and surgical outcomes between a three-dimensional and conventional microscope macular hole surgery. Kelkar A; Natarajan S; Kothari A; Bolisetty M BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):95. PubMed ID: 38429711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inverted internal limiting membrane insertion versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia: one-year study. Wakabayashi T; Ikuno Y; Shiraki N; Matsumura N; Sakaguchi H; Nishida K Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 256(8):1387-1393. PubMed ID: 29911271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF MACULAR HOLE RETINAL DETACHMENT IN HIGHLY MYOPIC EYES. Takahashi H; Inoue M; Koto T; Itoh Y; Hirota K; Hirakata A Retina; 2018 Dec; 38(12):2317-2326. PubMed ID: 29065014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Foveal microstructure and visual outcomes of myopic macular hole surgery with or without the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique. Hu XT; Pan QT; Zheng JW; Zhang ZD Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 103(10):1495-1502. PubMed ID: 30470714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Yuan J; Zhang LL; Lu YJ; Han MY; Yu AH; Cai XJ BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):219. PubMed ID: 29179705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery: Remodelling of Outer Retinal Layers after Traditional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique. Bottoni F; Parrulli S; Mete M; D'Agostino I; Cereda M; Cigada M; Maggio E; Maraone G; Iacovello D; Bottega E; Staurenghi G; Pertile G Ophthalmologica; 2020; 243(5):334-341. PubMed ID: 31940651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term surgical outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique in highly myopic macular hole retinal detachment. Kinoshita T; Onoda Y; Maeno T Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 255(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28220252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Insertion for Macular Hole-Associated Retinal Detachment in High Myopia. Chen SN; Yang CM Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 162():99-106.e1. PubMed ID: 26582311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique and the Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole with Retinal Detachment. Matsumura T; Takamura Y; Tomomatsu T; Arimura S; Gozawa M; Kobori A; Inatani M PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165068. PubMed ID: 27764184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. THREE-DIMENSIONAL HEAD-UP DISPLAY VERSUS STANDARD OPERATING MICROSCOPE FOR VITRECTOMY SURGERY: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Wang Y; Zhao X; Zhang W; Yang J; Chen Y Retina; 2022 Jun; 42(6):1151-1160. PubMed ID: 35067608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Macular Hole Closure With Internal Limiting Membrane Abrasion Technique. Mahajan VB; Chin EK; Tarantola RM; Almeida DR; Somani R; Boldt HC; Folk JC; Gehrs KM; Russell SR JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 133(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 25764352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Macular hole edge morphology predicts restoration of postoperative retinal microstructure and functional outcome. Tao J; Chen H; Zhu L; Pan D; Fang J; Chen Y; Mao J; Shen L BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):280. PubMed ID: 32652958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complete ILM Peeling Versus Inverted Flap Technique for Macular Hole Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. Marques RE; Sousa DC; Leal I; Faria MY; Marques-Neves C Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina; 2020 Mar; 51(3):187-A2. PubMed ID: 32211909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the inverted internal limiting membrane flap with autologous blood technique to internal limiting membrane insertion for the repair of refractory macular hole. Hu Z; Lin H; Liang Q; Wu R Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 31463622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]