68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3418440)
1. [The relation between hearing aid evaluations using magnitude estimation procedure and the speech discrimination ability].
Hosoi H; Kohno K; Murata K; Ohta F
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1988 May; 91(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 3418440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of hearing improvement due to hearing aids].
Welzl-Müller K; Sattler K
HNO; 1985 Jun; 33(6):275-8. PubMed ID: 4030411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method to establish the effect of the hearing aid in noise using Victoreen signal threshold and speech discrimination.
Lindström B; Svärd I; Bredberg G; Lundborg T
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():45-55. PubMed ID: 6577574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hearing aid quality judgments in reverberant and nonreverberant environments using a magnitude estimation procedure.
Harris RW; Goldstein DP
Audiology; 1985; 24(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 3977782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Speech discrimination and dynamic compression. A comparative study with hearing aids (author's transl)].
Welleschik B; Wicke W
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Jul; 56(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 142877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychoacoustic evaluation of present prostheses.
Bilger RC
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):92-104. PubMed ID: 405915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selection of hearing aids.
Weber HJ; Pirkey WP
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Feb; 11(1):173-86. PubMed ID: 662344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of hearing aids with amplitude compression.
Nábĕlek IV; Robinette LN
Audiology; 1977; 16(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 836256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Communication strategies used by individuals with moderate sensorineural hearing loss].
de Mello JM; Oliveira JR; Dell'Aringa AH; Oliveira VV; Zacare CC
Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 15109114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Practical hearing compensation and an assessment of hearing effect in patients with profound hearing loss using hearing aids].
Kawano A
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1993 Mar; 96(3):466-77. PubMed ID: 8473958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relative importance of recovery time in compression hearing aids.
Schweitzer HC; Causey GD
Audiology; 1977; 16(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 836255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):859-95. PubMed ID: 3281988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial: binaural amplification--state of the art.
Libby ER
Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):183-6. PubMed ID: 7297781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sound evaluation of partially implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant: comparative study of frequency responses.
Kodera K; Suzuki J; Nagai K; Yabe T
Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 8168442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
Fabry DA; Leek MR; Walden BE; Cord M
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech recognition with the bone-anchored hearing aid determined objectively and subjectively.
Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 8168444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Present status and outlook of the implantable hearing aid.
Gyo K; Yanagihara N; Saiki T; Hinohira Y
Am J Otol; 1990 Jul; 11(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 2399943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effect of venting the ear mold on speech discrimination in masking noise].
Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Fastl H
HNO; 1991 Sep; 39(9):356-61. PubMed ID: 1748579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials.
Van Tasell DJ; Yanz JL
J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 3669644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
