185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34184761)
1. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy in the detection of high-grade prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who underwent the Select MDx test.
Lendínez-Cano G; Ojeda-Claro AV; Gómez-Gómez E; Morales Jimenez P; Flores Martin J; Dominguez JF; Amores J; Cozar JM; Bachiller J; Juárez A; Linares R; Garcia Galisteo E; Alvarez Ossorio JL; Requena Tapia MJ; Moreno Jimenez J; Medina Lopez RA;
Prostate; 2021 Sep; 81(12):857-865. PubMed ID: 34184761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men.
Hendriks RJ; van der Leest MMG; Israël B; Hannink G; YantiSetiasti A; Cornel EB; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Klaver OS; Sedelaar JPM; Van Criekinge W; de Jong H; Mulders PFA; Crawford ED; Veltman J; Schalken JA; Barentsz JO; van Oort IM
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Dec; 24(4):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 33941866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators.
Roobol MJ; van Vugt HA; Loeb S; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; van Leenders AG; Steyerberg EW; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 22104592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the ERSPC Risk Calculator in a Contemporary Dutch Clinical Cohort.
Gayet M; Mannaerts CK; Nieboer D; Beerlage HP; Wijkstra H; Mulders PFA; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):228-234. PubMed ID: 28753781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The added value of percentage of free to total prostate-specific antigen, PCA3, and a kallikrein panel to the ERSPC risk calculator for prostate cancer in prescreened men.
Vedder MM; de Bekker-Grob EW; Lilja HG; Vickers AJ; van Leenders GJ; Steyerberg EW; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1109-15. PubMed ID: 25168616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer.
Wagaskar VG; Levy M; Ratnani P; Sullimada S; Gerenia M; Schlussel K; Choudhury S; Gabriele M; Haas I; Haines K; Tewari A
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2023 Jan; 6(1):e1668. PubMed ID: 36168681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Observational study comparing the accuracy/variability between the ERSPC and the PCPT risk calculators for the prediction of significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA <10 ng/mL.
Gomez Gomez E; Salamanca Bustos JJ; Carrasco Valiente J; Fernandez Rueda JL; Blanca A; Valero Rosa J; Bravo Arrebola I; Marquez López J; Jimenez Vacas JM; Luque R; Requena Tapia MJ
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e031032. PubMed ID: 31722940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging outperforms the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer.
Salami SS; Vira MA; Turkbey B; Fakhoury M; Yaskiv O; Villani R; Ben-Levi E; Rastinehad AR
Cancer; 2014 Sep; 120(18):2876-82. PubMed ID: 24917122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of PCA3 and multiparametric MRI's: collective benefits before deciding initial prostate biopsy for patients with PSA level between 3-10ng/mL.
Okcelik S; Soydan H; Ates F; Berber U; Saygin H; Sonmez G; Karademir K
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(3):449-55. PubMed ID: 27286106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging through PIRADS scoring system in biopsy naïve patients with suspicious prostate cancer.
Nowier A; Mazhar H; Salah R; Shabayek M
Arab J Urol; 2022; 20(3):121-125. PubMed ID: 35935910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a 25-Gene Panel urine test for prostate cancer diagnosis and potential treatment follow-up.
Johnson H; Guo J; Zhang X; Zhang H; Simoulis A; Wu AHB; Xia T; Li F; Tan W; Johnson A; Dizeyi N; Abrahamsson PA; Kenner L; Feng X; Zou C; Xiao K; Persson JL; Chen L
BMC Med; 2020 Dec; 18(1):376. PubMed ID: 33256740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Establishment and prospective validation of an SUV
Jiao J; Kang F; Zhang J; Quan Z; Wen W; Zhao X; Ma S; Wu P; Yang F; Guo W; Yang X; Yuan J; Shi Y; Wang J; Qin W
Theranostics; 2021; 11(17):8396-8411. PubMed ID: 34373749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer.
Rais-Bahrami S; Siddiqui MM; Turkbey B; Stamatakis L; Logan J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Vourganti S; Truong H; Kruecker J; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1721-1727. PubMed ID: 23727310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
