185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34184761)
21. The Value of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Improving the Detection of Anterior Prostate Cancer.
Zugor V; Kühn R; Engelhard K; Poth S; Bernat MM; Porres D; Labanaris AP
Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4279-83. PubMed ID: 27466544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PCA3 as a second-line biomarker in a prospective controlled randomized opportunistic prostate cancer screening programme.
Rubio-Briones J; Casanova J; Martínez F; Domínguez-Escrig JL; Fernández-Serra A; Dumont R; Ramírez-Backhaus M; Gómez-Ferrer A; Collado A; Rubio L; Molina A; Vanaclocha M; Sala D; Lopez-Guerrero JA
Actas Urol Esp; 2017 Jun; 41(5):300-308. PubMed ID: 28342633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Plus PCA3 for Individualized Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment.
Tomlins SA; Day JR; Lonigro RJ; Hovelson DH; Siddiqui J; Kunju LP; Dunn RL; Meyer S; Hodge P; Groskopf J; Wei JT; Chinnaiyan AM
Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 25985884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of High-grade Prostate Cancer Using a Urinary Molecular Biomarker-Based Risk Score.
Van Neste L; Hendriks RJ; Dijkstra S; Trooskens G; Cornel EB; Jannink SA; de Jong H; Hessels D; Smit FP; Melchers WJ; Leyten GH; de Reijke TM; Vergunst H; Kil P; Knipscheer BC; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Mulders PF; van Oort IM; Van Criekinge W; Schalken JA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):740-748. PubMed ID: 27108162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Prospective Adaptive Utility Trial to Validate Performance of a Novel Urine Exosome Gene Expression Assay to Predict High-grade Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen 2-10ng/ml at Initial Biopsy.
McKiernan J; Donovan MJ; Margolis E; Partin A; Carter B; Brown G; Torkler P; Noerholm M; Skog J; Shore N; Andriole G; Thompson I; Carroll P
Eur Urol; 2018 Dec; 74(6):731-738. PubMed ID: 30237023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of digital rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging for T staging of prostate cancer.
Zhu J; Wu X; Xue Y; Li X; Zheng Q; Xue X; Huang Z; Chen S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023 Aug; 19(4):1024-1030. PubMed ID: 37675732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis.
Avolio PP; Lughezzani G; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Uleri A; Frego N; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Saita A; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM
Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):832.e1-832.e7. PubMed ID: 34183255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Enhancement of prostate cancer diagnosis by machine learning techniques: an algorithm development and validation study.
Chiu PK; Shen X; Wang G; Ho CL; Leung CH; Ng CF; Choi KS; Teoh JY
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):672-676. PubMed ID: 34267331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of a 2-gene mRNA urine test for the detection of ≥GG2 prostate cancer in an opportunistic screening population.
Rubio-Briones J; Borque-Fernando A; Esteban LM; Mascarós JM; Ramírez-Backhaus M; Casanova J; Collado A; Mir C; Gómez-Ferrer A; Wong A; Aragón F; Calatrava A; López-Guerrero JA; Groskopf J; Schalken J; Van Criekinge W; Domínguez-Escrig J
Prostate; 2020 May; 80(6):500-507. PubMed ID: 32077525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-Specific Antigen and Digital Rectal Examination in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital.
Ozah E; Imasogie DE
J West Afr Coll Surg; 2023; 13(3):91-95. PubMed ID: 37538216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Negative Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Risk of Significant Prostate Cancer: Baseline and Long-Term Followup Results.
Buisset J; Norris JM; Puech P; Leroy X; Ramdane N; Drumez E; Villers A; Olivier J
J Urol; 2021 Mar; 205(3):725-731. PubMed ID: 33080153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate can improve the predictive value of the urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 test in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and a previous negative biopsy.
Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Cattarino S; Busetto GM; De Berardinis E; Ciccariello M; Gentile V; Salciccia S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1661-5. PubMed ID: 22564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Analysis of risk factors for determining the need for prostate biopsy in patients with negative MRI.
Liang L; Qi F; Cheng Y; Zhang L; Cao D; Cheng G; Hua L
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6048. PubMed ID: 33723287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predicting Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: A Preliminary Investigation on Screening with Ultrahigh B-Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as an Innovative Diagnostic Biomarker.
Zhang K; Shen Y; Zhang X; Ma L; Wang H; An N; Guo A; Ye H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151176. PubMed ID: 26963936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
