206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34184782)
1. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers.
Iakymenko OA; Lugo I; Briski LM; Nemov I; Punnen S; Kwon D; Pollack A; Stoyanova R; Parekh DJ; Jorda M; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
Prostate; 2021 Sep; 81(12):866-873. PubMed ID: 34184782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Cancer Grade and Tumor Volume Does Not Have an Independent Effect on Adverse Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes Compared to Usual Acinar Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.
Iakymenko OA; Lugo I; Kwon D; Zhao W; Hayee A; Punnen S; Parekh DJ; Pollack A; Ritch CR; Gonzalgo ML; Stoyanova R; Jorda M; Kryvenko ON
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():108-114. PubMed ID: 31711982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Tumor Grade, Stage, and Margin Status Does Not Independently Influence the Likelihood of Biochemical Recurrence in Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
Kryvenko ON; Iakymenko OA; De Lima Guido LP; Bhattu AS; Merhe A; Mouzannar A; Briski LM; Oymagil I; Lugo I; Nemov I; Ritch CR; Kava BR; Punnen S; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Gonzalgo ML
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Aug; 146(8):1012-1017. PubMed ID: 34739539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.
Hansen J; Bianchi M; Sun M; Rink M; Castiglione F; Abdollah F; Steuber T; Ahyai SA; Steurer S; Göbel C; Freschi M; Montorsi F; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2014 Mar; 113(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 24053339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anterior or Posterior Prostate Cancer Tumor Nodule Location Predicts Likelihood of Certain Adverse Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy.
Hayee A; Lugo I; Iakymenko OA; Kwon D; Briski LM; Zhao W; Nemov I; Punnen S; Ritch CR; Pollack A; Jorda M; Stoyanova R; Parekh DJ; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Jul; 146(7):833-839. PubMed ID: 34669939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tumour volume is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Nelson BA; Shappell SB; Chang SS; Wells N; Farnham SB; Smith JA; Cookson MS
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1169-72. PubMed ID: 16686706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the cut-off values of tumor diameter, degree of extraprostatic extension, and extent of surgical margin positivity with regard to biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Kir G; Arikan EA; Seneldir H; Ankarali H; Oznergiz S; Olgun ZC; Yildirim A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44():151431. PubMed ID: 31837592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Gleason pattern 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens in current practice - Quantification, morphology and concordance with biopsy.
de Souza MF; de Azevedo Araujo ALC; da Silva MT; Athanazio DA
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2018 Jun; 34():13-17. PubMed ID: 29661718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tumor volume adds prognostic value in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Kim KH; Lim SK; Shin TY; Kang DR; Han WK; Chung BH; Rha KH; Hong SJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):3133-9. PubMed ID: 23720069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oncologic outcomes of organ-confined Gleason grade group 4-5 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Preisser F; Wang N; Abrams-Pompe RS; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 40(4):161.e9-161.e14. PubMed ID: 34973856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor volume improves the long-term prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with positive surgical margins.
Meyer CP; Hansen J; Boehm K; Tilki D; Abdollah F; Trinh QD; Fisch M; Sauter G; Graefen M; Huland H; Chun FK; Ahyai SA
World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 27260503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins].
Roux V; Eyraud R; Brureau L; Gourtaud G; Senechal C; Fofana M; Blanchet P
Prog Urol; 2017; 27(8-9):467-473. PubMed ID: 28576421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients.
Seyrek N; Hollemans E; Osanto S; Pelger RCM; van der Poel HG; Bekers E; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG; van Leenders GJLH
Histopathology; 2022 Feb; 80(3):558-565. PubMed ID: 34706119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
