131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34184846)
1. Short-term outcomes of anterior approach sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical vaginal prolapse - A retrospective study.
Siddiqui S; Gayen A; Wong V
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2021 Jun; 13(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 34184846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes.
van Oudheusden AMJ; Coolen AWM; Hoskam H; Veen J; Bongers MY
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):211-223. PubMed ID: 35482083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical Outcomes and Feasibility of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation through Anterior Approach for Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Agrawal M; Kumari R; Sharma JB; Nisha N; Manasi D; Bhatla N
J Midlife Health; 2023; 14(4):280-284. PubMed ID: 38504730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse using sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement.
Lo TS; Horng SG; Huang HJ; Lee SJ; Liang CC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Oct; 84(10):992-5. PubMed ID: 16167917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up.
Lo TS; Al-Kharabsheh AM; Tan YL; Pue LB; Hsieh WC; Uy-Patrimonio MC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 29241922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anterior or posterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: long-term anatomic and functional evaluation.
Goldberg RP; Tomezsko JE; Winkler HA; Koduri S; Culligan PJ; Sand PK
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 98(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 11506833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation of the Vault during Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Dangal G; Poudel R; Shrestha R; Karki A; Pradhan HK; Bhattachan K; Bajracharya N
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2018 Oct; 16(3):321-324. PubMed ID: 30455493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation: A Safe Route for Apical Repair.
Solomon ER; St Marie P; Jones KA; Harmanli O
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Aug; 26(8):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 32487884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial.
Svabik K; Martan A; Masata J; El-Haddad R; Hubka P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24615948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Application of transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organs prolapse].
Argirović R; Likić-Ladević I; Vrzić-Petronijević S; Petronijević M; Ladević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2005 Sep; 62(9):637-43. PubMed ID: 16229205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sacrospinous Fixation and Vaginal Uterosacral Suspension-Evaluation in Uterine Preservation Surgery.
Woodburn KL; Yuan AS; Torosis M; Roberts K; Ferrando CA; Gutman RE
Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 May; 29(5):469-478. PubMed ID: 36516026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term outcomes of sacrospinous hysteropexy through an anterior approach.
Plair A; Dutta R; Overholt TL; Matthews C
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1555-1563. PubMed ID: 33439280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse.
Lantzsch T; Goepel C; Wolters M; Koelbl H; Methfessel HD
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2001 Mar; 265(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11327088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and efficiency of modified sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: Long-term studies and outcomes.
Hu P; Zhong C; Lu S; Lei L; Wang Y; Liu L
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Mar; 156(3):566-572. PubMed ID: 34117780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Outcomes of the Manchester Procedure Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Hysteropexy for Uterine Prolapse: A Study of the British Society of Urogynaecology Database.
Tan ACC; Latthe P
Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38847822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden A; Veen J; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Housmans S; van Kuijk S; Deprest J; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven H
BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
