134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34184992)
1. Usability Analysis of a Health Sciences Digital Library by Medical Residents: Cross-sectional Survey.
Jamal A; Tharkar S; Alenazi H; Julaidan BS; Al Hindawi DA; AlAkeel NS; AlNuhayer OM; AlDubaikhi RH
JMIR Form Res; 2021 Jun; 5(6):e23293. PubMed ID: 34184992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. System Usability Scale Benchmarking for Digital Health Apps: Meta-analysis.
Hyzy M; Bond R; Mulvenna M; Bai L; Dix A; Leigh S; Hunt S
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Aug; 10(8):e37290. PubMed ID: 35980732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Formative Usability Evaluation of a Three-Way Digital Healthcare System for the People with Disabilities and Their Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Kim JH; Bae YH; Kim SS; Lee M; Ho SH
Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 36421649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. User Evaluation of the Swedish Patient Accessible Electronic Health Record: System Usability Scale.
Hägglund M; Scandurra I
JMIR Hum Factors; 2021 Jul; 8(3):e24927. PubMed ID: 34313596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing Single-Page, Multipage, and Conversational Digital Forms in Health Care: Usability Study.
Iftikhar A; Bond RR; McGilligan V; Leslie SJ; Rjoob K; Knoery C; Quigg C; Campbell R; Boyd K; McShane A; Peace A
JMIR Hum Factors; 2021 May; 8(2):e25787. PubMed ID: 34037531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A usability evaluation of the perceived user friendliness, accessibility, and inclusiveness of a personalized digital care pathway tool.
Heijsters FACJ; van Loon GAP; Santema JMM; Mullender MG; Bouman M; de Bruijne MC; van Nassau F
Int J Med Inform; 2023 Jul; 175():105070. PubMed ID: 37121138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. National survey of user-reported usability of electronic medical record software in ophthalmology in Germany.
Fuhrmann L; Schargus M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 261(11):3325-3334. PubMed ID: 37378879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool (myfood24) in Norwegian Women and Men Aged 60-74 Years: Usability Study.
Hopstock LA; Medin AC; Skeie G; Henriksen A; Lundblad MW
JMIR Form Res; 2022 Mar; 6(3):e35092. PubMed ID: 35275079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applying Website Rankings to Digital Health Centers in the United States to Assess Public Engagement: Website Usability Study.
Calvano JD; Fundingsland EL; Lai D; Silacci S; Raja AS; He S
JMIR Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 8(1):e20721. PubMed ID: 33779564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Digital Cognitive Aid for Anesthesia to Support Intraoperative Crisis Management: Results of the User-Centered Design Process.
Schild S; Sedlmayr B; Schumacher AK; Sedlmayr M; Prokosch HU; St Pierre M;
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e13226. PubMed ID: 31033445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a Digital Health Initiative in Illicit Substance Use: Cross-sectional Survey Study.
Kershaw S; Birrell L; Deen H; Newton NC; Stapinski LA; Champion KE; Kay-Lambkin F; Teesson M; Chapman C
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Aug; 23(8):e29026. PubMed ID: 34383690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usability Evaluation of a Noninvasive Neutropenia Screening Device (PointCheck) for Patients Undergoing Cancer Chemotherapy: Mixed Methods Observational Study.
Lamaj G; Pablo-Trinidad A; Butterworth I; Bell N; Benasutti R; Bourquard A; Sanchez-Ferro A; Castro-Gonzalez C; Jiménez-Ubieto A; Baumann T; Rodriguez-Izquierdo A; Pottier E; Shelton A; Martinez-Lopez J; Sloan JM
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Aug; 24(8):e37368. PubMed ID: 35943786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Association Between Perceived Electronic Health Record Usability and Professional Burnout Among US Physicians.
Melnick ER; Dyrbye LN; Sinsky CA; Trockel M; West CP; Nedelec L; Tutty MA; Shanafelt T
Mayo Clin Proc; 2020 Mar; 95(3):476-487. PubMed ID: 31735343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: relationship of quality components to users' characteristics.
Rangraz Jeddi F; Nabovati E; Bigham R; Khajouei R
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Jan; 133():104026. PubMed ID: 31733603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Mobile Web App to Improve Health Screening Uptake in Men (ScreenMen): Utility and Usability Evaluation Study.
Teo CH; Ng CJ; Lo SK; Lim CD; White A
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e10216. PubMed ID: 30985280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usability Study of Mainstream Wearable Fitness Devices: Feature Analysis and System Usability Scale Evaluation.
Liang J; Xian D; Liu X; Fu J; Zhang X; Tang B; Lei J
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Nov; 6(11):e11066. PubMed ID: 30409767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India.
Pal D; Vanijja V
Child Youth Serv Rev; 2020 Dec; 119():105535. PubMed ID: 33020676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stakeholder acceptance of digital team-based learning.
Currey J; Sprogis SK; Burdeu G; Story I; Considine J; O'Donnell M; Gentle A; Backhouse S; Oldland E
Nurse Educ Pract; 2020 Jul; 46():102833. PubMed ID: 32778378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital Self-Management in Support of Patients Living With Chronic Pain: Feasibility Pilot Study.
Bostrøm K; Børøsund E; Varsi C; Eide H; Flakk Nordang E; Schreurs KM; Waxenberg LB; Weiss KE; Morrison EJ; Cvancarova Småstuen M; Stubhaug A; Solberg Nes L
JMIR Form Res; 2020 Oct; 4(10):e23893. PubMed ID: 33094734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a patient information website for childhood cancer survivors.
Knijnenburg SL; Kremer LC; Versluys AB; Braam KI; Mud MS; van der Pal HJ; Caron HN; Jaspers MW
Support Care Cancer; 2013 Apr; 21(4):919-26. PubMed ID: 23007883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
