146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34185079)
21. OPUS-X: an open-source toolkit for protein torsion angles, secondary structure, solvent accessibility, contact map predictions and 3D folding.
Xu G; Wang Q; Ma J
Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 38(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 34478500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rosetta predictions in CASP5: successes, failures, and prospects for complete automation.
Bradley P; Chivian D; Meiler J; Misura KM; Rohl CA; Schief WR; Wedemeyer WJ; Schueler-Furman O; Murphy P; Schonbrun J; Strauss CE; Baker D
Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():457-68. PubMed ID: 14579334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Protein Multiple Conformation Prediction Using Multi-Objective Evolution Algorithm.
Hou M; Jin S; Cui X; Peng C; Zhao K; Song L; Zhang G
Interdiscip Sci; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38190097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combining Evolutionary Information and an Iterative Sampling Strategy for Accurate Protein Structure Prediction.
Braun T; Koehler Leman J; Lange OF
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004661. PubMed ID: 26713437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Geometric potentials from deep learning improve prediction of CDR H3 loop structures.
Ruffolo JA; Guerra C; Mahajan SP; Sulam J; Gray JJ
Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i268-i275. PubMed ID: 32657412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Protein structure prediction using sparse NOE and RDC restraints with Rosetta in CASP13.
Kuenze G; Meiler J
Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1341-1350. PubMed ID: 31292988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Balancing exploration and exploitation in population-based sampling improves fragment-based de novo protein structure prediction.
Simoncini D; Schiex T; Zhang KY
Proteins; 2017 May; 85(5):852-858. PubMed ID: 28066917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MoLPC2: improved prediction of large protein complex structures and stoichiometry using Monte Carlo Tree Search and AlphaFold2.
Chim HY; Elofsson A
Bioinformatics; 2024 Jun; 40(6):. PubMed ID: 38781500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An Evolutionary Profile Guided Greedy Parallel Replica-Exchange Monte Carlo Search Algorithm for Rapid Convergence in Protein Design.
Banerjee A; Pal K; Mitra P
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(2):489-499. PubMed ID: 31329126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Simulated tempering yields insight into the low-resolution Rosetta scoring functions.
Bowman GR; Pande VS
Proteins; 2009 Feb; 74(3):777-88. PubMed ID: 18767152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improved Protein Structure Prediction Using a New Multi-Scale Network and Homologous Templates.
Su H; Wang W; Du Z; Peng Z; Gao SH; Cheng MM; Yang J
Adv Sci (Weinh); 2021 Dec; 8(24):e2102592. PubMed ID: 34719864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins.
Jones DT; Singh T; Kosciolek T; Tetchner S
Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 31(7):999-1006. PubMed ID: 25431331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A structural homology approach for computational protein design with flexible backbone.
Simoncini D; Zhang KYJ; Schiex T; Barbe S
Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(14):2418-2426. PubMed ID: 30496341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. LS-align: an atom-level, flexible ligand structural alignment algorithm for high-throughput virtual screening.
Hu J; Liu Z; Yu DJ; Zhang Y
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):2209-2218. PubMed ID: 29462237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sampling bottlenecks in de novo protein structure prediction.
Kim DE; Blum B; Bradley P; Baker D
J Mol Biol; 2009 Oct; 393(1):249-60. PubMed ID: 19646450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Generalized protein structure prediction based on combination of fold-recognition with de novo folding and evaluation of models.
Koliński A; Bujnicki JM
Proteins; 2005; 61 Suppl 7():84-90. PubMed ID: 16187348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identifying native-like protein structures with scoring functions based on all-atom ECEPP force fields, implicit solvent models and structure relaxation.
Arnautova YA; Vorobjev YN; Vila JA; Scheraga HA
Proteins; 2009 Oct; 77(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 19384995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multi contact-based folding method for de novo protein structure prediction.
Hou M; Peng C; Zhou X; Zhang B; Zhang G
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Jan; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 34849573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Balancing multiple objectives in conformation sampling to control decoy diversity in template-free protein structure prediction.
Zaman AB; Shehu A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):211. PubMed ID: 31023237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
