140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34187279)
1. Comparison of automated and traditional ECAP recording approaches in clinical practice.
Estienne P; Scaglia A; Kontides A; Lauss K; Schwarz K; Arauz SL
Int J Audiol; 2022 Jul; 61(7):583-591. PubMed ID: 34187279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Two Measurement Paradigms to Determine Electrically Evoked Cochlear Nerve Responses and Their Correlation to Cochlear Nerve Cross-section in Infants and Young Children With Cochlear Implant.
Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):e206-e213. PubMed ID: 38361306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3461-3473. PubMed ID: 38219245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a Traditional and Novel Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recording Approach and Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses in Pediatric Cochlear Implants Users.
Garrido LC; Schwarz K; Lauss K; Vernetta CP; Kontides A; Gomez MD; Calvete AG; Carceller MA
J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Dec; 14(3):353-358. PubMed ID: 30541708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximum acceptable level for the determination of ECAP and ESRT in a paediatric population.
Di Berardino F; Cavicchiolo S; Del Carmen Fuentes M; Kontides A; Lauss K; Zanetti D
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Jul; 23(4):214-224. PubMed ID: 35380097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds.
Hoth S; Spitzer P; Praetorius M
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29161976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
Chao X; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H; Fan Z; Xu L
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4309. PubMed ID: 36922582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of auditory nerve functional states on the correlations between human and computer decisions for electrically evoked compound action potential threshold.
Li Q; Zhang C; Lu T; Xu C; Sun Z; Fan W; Wang Z; Li S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109866. PubMed ID: 31945736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation.
Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Lamminmäki S; Ylönen J; Markkola A; Sinkkonen ST
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 158():111160. PubMed ID: 35544967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users.
Kosaner J; Spitzer P; Bayguzina S; Gultekin M; Behar LA
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29291688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Site of prelingual cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials and refractory using the Nucleus 24 standard].
Ma RY; Li W; Jiang XJ
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 30(23):1854-1858. PubMed ID: 29798012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.
Brill S; Müller J; Hagen R; Möltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I; Strahl S
Biomed Eng Online; 2009 Dec; 8():40. PubMed ID: 20015362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Characteristics of responsiveness of cochlear nerve to electrical stimulation in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency].
Chao XH; Luo JF; Wang RJ; Fan ZM; Wang HB; Xu L
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 58(7):657-665. PubMed ID: 37455110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
