These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34188136)

  • 1. The maintenance of microbial community in human fecal samples by a cost effective preservation buffer.
    Wu C; Chen T; Xu W; Zhang T; Pei Y; Yang Y; Zhang F; Guo H; Wang Q; Wang L; Zhao B
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13453. PubMed ID: 34188136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.
    Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
    Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F
    Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Sample Preservation and Storage Methods for Metaproteomics Analysis of Intestinal Microbiomes.
    Mordant A; Kleiner M
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0187721. PubMed ID: 34908431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ionic liquid-based reagents improve the stability of midterm fecal sample storage.
    Hao L; Xia Z; Yang H; Wang J; Han M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():68-73. PubMed ID: 28506638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of DNA stabilizers and storage conditions on preserving fecal microbiota profiles.
    Chen CC; Wu WK; Chang CM; Panyod S; Lu TP; Liou JM; Fang YJ; Chuang EY; Wu MS
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Dec; 119(12):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 32111519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of field conditions on fecal microbiota.
    Hale VL; Tan CL; Niu K; Yang Y; Cui D; Zhao H; Knight R; Amato KR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():180-188. PubMed ID: 27686380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preservation of the fecal samples at ambient temperature for microbiota analysis with a cost-effective and reliable stabilizer EffcGut.
    Yang L; Hou K; Zhang B; Ouyang C; Lin A; Xu S; Ke D; Fang L; Chen Q; Wu J; Yan C; Lian Y; Jiang T; He J; Wang H; Fu Y; Xiao C; Chen Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Nov; 741():140423. PubMed ID: 32615432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel affordable reagent for room temperature storage and transport of fecal samples for metagenomic analyses.
    Han M; Hao L; Lin Y; Li F; Wang J; Yang H; Xiao L; Kristiansen K; Jia H; Li J
    Microbiome; 2018 Feb; 6(1):43. PubMed ID: 29482661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut.
    Franzosa EA; Morgan XC; Segata N; Waldron L; Reyes J; Earl AM; Giannoukos G; Boylan MR; Ciulla D; Gevers D; Izard J; Garrett WS; Chan AT; Huttenhower C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jun; 111(22):E2329-38. PubMed ID: 24843156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].
    Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Home-Made Cost Effective Preservation Buffer Is a Better Alternative to Commercial Preservation Methods for Microbiome Research.
    Menke S; Gillingham MA; Wilhelm K; Sommer S
    Front Microbiol; 2017; 8():102. PubMed ID: 28197142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gut microbiome comparability of fresh-frozen versus stabilized-frozen samples from hospitalized patients using 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing.
    Ilett EE; Jørgensen M; Noguera-Julian M; Daugaard G; Murray DD; Helleberg M; Paredes R; Lundgren J; Sengeløv H; MacPherson C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13351. PubMed ID: 31527823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative methods for fecal sample storage to preserve gut microbial structure and function in an in vitro model of the human colon.
    Deschamps C; Fournier E; Uriot O; Lajoie F; Verdier C; Comtet-Marre S; Thomas M; Kapel N; Cherbuy C; Alric M; Almeida M; Etienne-Mesmin L; Blanquet-Diot S
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 104(23):10233-10247. PubMed ID: 33085024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of preservation method on canine (
    Horng KR; Ganz HH; Eisen JA; Marks SL
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4827. PubMed ID: 29844978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
    Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
    BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance comparison of fecal preservative and stock solutions for gut microbiome storage at room temperature.
    Park C; Yun KE; Chu JM; Lee JY; Hong CP; Nam YD; Jeong J; Han K; Ahn YJ
    J Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 58(8):703-710. PubMed ID: 32583287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
    Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
    Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How should we store avian faecal samples for microbiota analyses? Comparing efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
    Vargas-Pellicer P; Watrobska C; Knowles S; Schroeder J; Banks-Leite C
    J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Oct; 165():105689. PubMed ID: 31425715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of a portable desiccant system for preservation of fecal samples for downstream 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
    Johnson PJ; Hargreaves LL; Zobrist CN; Ericsson AC
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Mar; 146():1-6. PubMed ID: 29355576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.