These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34189999)

  • 1. Effects of Noise and Second Language on Conversational Dynamics in Task Dialogue.
    Sørensen AJM; Fereczkowski M; MacDonald EN
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211024482. PubMed ID: 34189999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Noise on Conversational Dynamics Between Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Talkers.
    Petersen EB; MacDonald EN; Josefine Munch Sørensen A
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221103340. PubMed ID: 35862280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating conversational dynamics in triads: Effects of noise, hearing impairment, and hearing aids.
    Petersen EB
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1289637. PubMed ID: 38680286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speak Up: How Hearing Loss and the Lack of Hearing Aids Affect Conversations in Quiet.
    Petersen EB; Parker D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Aug; 67(8):2782-2793. PubMed ID: 38995861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timing in conversation is dynamically adjusted turn by turn in dyadic telephone conversations.
    Pouw W; Holler J
    Cognition; 2022 May; 222():105015. PubMed ID: 35033863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Montclair Map Task: Balance, Efficacy, and Efficiency in Conversational Interaction.
    Pardo JS; Urmanche A; Gash H; Wiener J; Mason N; Wilman S; Francis K; Decker A
    Lang Speech; 2019 Jun; 62(2):378-398. PubMed ID: 29857788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.
    Ferguson SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eliciting Naturalistic Conversations: A Method for Assessing Communication Ability, Subjective Experience, and the Impacts of Noise and Hearing Impairment.
    Beechey T; Buchholz JM; Keidser G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Feb; 62(2):470-484. PubMed ID: 30950689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling Speech Level as a Function of Background Noise Level and Talker-to-Listener Distance for Talkers Wearing Hearing Protection Devices.
    Bouserhal RE; Bockstael A; MacDonald E; Falk TH; Voix J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3393-3403. PubMed ID: 29204606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the Everyday Conversational Sentences in Noise test.
    Miles KM; Keidser G; Freeston K; Beechey T; Best V; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):1562. PubMed ID: 32237858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language-independent talker-specificity in first-language and second-language speech production by bilingual talkers: L1 speaking rate predicts L2 speaking rate.
    Bradlow AR; Kim M; Blasingame M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):886. PubMed ID: 28253679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strategies adopted by talkers faced with fluctuating and competing-speech maskers.
    Aubanel V; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2884-94. PubMed ID: 24116425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Lewis DE; Smith NA; Spalding JL; Valente DL
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):783-794. PubMed ID: 29252979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Within-talker and within-session stability of acoustic characteristics of conversational and clear speaking stylesa).
    Ferguson SH; Morgan SD; Hunter EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jan; 155(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 38174965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. L2 speech perception in noise: An fMRI study of advanced Spanish learners.
    Rammell CS; Cheng H; Pisoni DB; Newman SD
    Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 1720():146316. PubMed ID: 31278936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The conversational skills of school-aged children with cochlear implants.
    Toe DM; Paatsch LE
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Mar; 14(2):67-79. PubMed ID: 23453220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing Aid Amplification Reduces Communication Effort of People With Hearing Impairment and Their Conversation Partners.
    Beechey T; Buchholz JM; Keidser G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 63(4):1299-1311. PubMed ID: 32259454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.