These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34189999)

  • 21. Timing of head turns to upcoming talkers in triadic conversation: Evidence for prediction of turn ends and interruptions.
    Hadley LV; Culling JF
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1061582. PubMed ID: 36605274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conversational distance adaptation in noise and its effect on signal-to-noise ratio in realistic listening environments.
    Weisser A; Miles K; Richardson MJ; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Apr; 149(4):2896. PubMed ID: 33940874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech, movement, and gaze behaviours during dyadic conversation in noise.
    Hadley LV; Brimijoin WO; Whitmer WM
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10451. PubMed ID: 31320658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Child, Young Adult, and Older Adult Talkers.
    Smiljanic R; Gilbert RC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3069-3080. PubMed ID: 29075748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.
    Yi H; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How do aging and age-related hearing loss affect the ability to communicate effectively in challenging communicative conditions?
    Hazan V; Tuomainen O; Tu L; Kim J; Davis C; Brungart D; Sheffield B
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():33-41. PubMed ID: 29941310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Online Control of Voice Intensity in Late Bilinguals' First and Second Language Speech Production: Evidence From Unexpected and Brief Noise Masking.
    Cai X; Yin Y; Zhang Q
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 May; 64(5):1471-1489. PubMed ID: 33830851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hearing Impairment Increases Communication Effort During Conversations in Noise.
    Beechey T; Buchholz JM; Keidser G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 63(1):305-320. PubMed ID: 31846598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
    Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Behavioral dynamics of conversation, (mis)communication and coordination in noisy environments.
    Miles K; Weisser A; Kallen RW; Varlet M; Richardson MJ; Buchholz JM
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20271. PubMed ID: 37985887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Classroom noise and children learning through a second language: double jeopardy?
    Nelson P; Kohnert K; Sabur S; Shaw D
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2005 Jul; 36(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 16175885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speaking Clearly for Older Adults With Normal Hearing: The Role of Speaking Rate.
    Krause JC; Panagiotopoulos AP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3851-3859. PubMed ID: 31580758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3004-13. PubMed ID: 12509022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech production in noise with and without hearing protection.
    Tufts JB; Frank T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):1069-80. PubMed ID: 12942985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monitoring speech production and comprehension: Where is the second-language delay?
    Broos WP; Duyck W; Hartsuiker RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1601-1619. PubMed ID: 30270750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hearing speech in noise: seeing a loud talker is better.
    Kim J; Sironic A; Davis C
    Perception; 2011; 40(7):853-62. PubMed ID: 22128557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conversational speech levels and signal-to-noise ratios in realistic acoustic conditions.
    Weisser A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):349. PubMed ID: 30710956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.