179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34190189)
1. Comparison of the sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and combinations of these imaging modalities for the detection of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer.
Chen HL; Zhou JQ; Chen Q; Deng YC
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jul; 100(26):e26531. PubMed ID: 34190189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is it worth to perform preoperative MRI for breast cancer after mammography, tomosynthesis and ultrasound?
González-Huebra I; Elizalde A; García-Baizán A; Calvo M; Ezponda A; Martínez-Regueira F; Pina L
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Apr; 57():317-322. PubMed ID: 30580077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency for breast cancer in Chinese women using mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and different combinations of these imaging modalities.
Shao H; Li B; Zhang X; Xiong Z; Liu Y; Tang G
J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 23694915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of BSGI, MRI, mammography, and ultrasound for the diagnosis of breast lesions and their correlations with specific molecular subtypes in Chinese women.
Liu H; Zhan H; Sun D; Zhang Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Aug; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 32799808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), ultrasound and mammography for detection of breast cancer based on tumor type, breast density and patient's history: A review.
Aristokli N; Polycarpou I; Themistocleous SC; Sophocleous D; Mamais I
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):848-856. PubMed ID: 35148941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging Phenotypes in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer on Mammography, Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using the Fifth Edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Marino MA; Riedl CC; Bernathova M; Bernhart C; Baltzer PAT; Helbich TH; Pinker K
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():150-159. PubMed ID: 30150038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative breast cancer staging with multi-modality imaging and surgical outcomes.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Tagliafico A; Campanino PP; Bosco D; Casella C; Bussone R; Ala A; Castellano I; Sapino A; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Houssami N
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 122():108766. PubMed ID: 31809942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging in addition to mammography and breast ultrasonography change the operative management of breast carcinoma?
Lim HI; Choi JH; Yang JH; Han BK; Lee JE; Lee SK; Kim WW; Kim S; Kim JS; Kim JH; Choe JH; Cho EY; Kang SS; Shin JH; Ko EY; Kim SW; Nam SJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 19760039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative staging by multimodal imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer: Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography compared to conventional mammography, ultrasound, and MRI.
Daniaux M; Gruber L; De Zordo T; Geiger-Gritsch S; Amort B; Santner W; Egle D; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jun; 163():110838. PubMed ID: 37080064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Girardi V; Carbognin G; Camera L; Baglio I; Bucci A; Bonetti F; Mucelli RP
Radiol Med; 2011 Dec; 116(8):1226-38. PubMed ID: 21744256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging of Intracystic Papillary Carcinoma.
Speer ME; Adrada BE; Arribas EM; Hess KR; Middleton LP; Whitman GJ
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019; 48(4):348-352. PubMed ID: 30072190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case-Control Comparative Analysis.
Lai HW; Chen CJ; Lin YJ; Chen SL; Wu HK; Wu YT; Kuo SJ; Chen ST; Chen DR
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(22):e3810. PubMed ID: 27258520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristic features and usefulness of MRI in breast cancer in patients under 40 years old: correlations with conventional imaging and prognostic factors.
An YY; Kim SH; Kang BJ
Breast Cancer; 2014 May; 21(3):302-15. PubMed ID: 22723056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced breast MRI and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced breast MRI with mammography and ultrasound for the detection of breast cancer.
Gilbert FJ; van den Bosch HC; Petrillo A; Siegmann K; Heverhagen JT; Panizza P; Gehl HB; Pediconi F; Diekmann F; Peng WJ; Ma L; Sardanelli F; Belli P; Corcione S; Zechmann CM; Faivre-Pierret M; Martincich L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1272-86. PubMed ID: 25006633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of breast MRI in planning the surgical treatment of breast cancer.
Duygulu G; Oktay A; Bilgen IG; Kapkaç M; Zekioğlu O
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 22581712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-resolution diffusion-weighted MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult breast cancers in women with dense breasts.
Kim HJ; Shin HJ; Baek S; Lee CW; Choi WJ; Chae EY; Cha JH; Kim HH; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 175():111440. PubMed ID: 38547744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tumor Size of Invasive Breast Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Conventional Imaging (Mammogram/Ultrasound): Comparison with Pathological Size and Clinical Implications.
Haraldsdóttir KH; Jónsson Þ; Halldórsdóttir AB; Tranberg KG; Ásgeirsson KS
Scand J Surg; 2017 Mar; 106(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 26929290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
