228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34191638)
1. Isometric agonist and antagonist muscle activation interacts differently with 140-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation aftereffects at different intensities.
Shorafa Y; Halawa I; Hewitt M; Nitsche MA; Antal A; Paulus W
J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jul; 126(1):340-348. PubMed ID: 34191638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation on motor cortex excitability and motor function.
Naro A; Bramanti A; Leo A; Manuli A; Sciarrone F; Russo M; Bramanti P; Calabrò RS
Brain Struct Funct; 2017 Aug; 222(6):2891-2906. PubMed ID: 28064346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cumulative effects of single TMS pulses during beta-tACS are stimulation intensity-dependent.
Raco V; Bauer R; Norim S; Gharabaghi A
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1055-1060. PubMed ID: 28779945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring parameters of gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and full-spectrum transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on human pharyngeal cortical excitability.
Zhang M; Cheng I; Sasegbon A; Dou Z; Hamdy S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Sep; 33(9):e14173. PubMed ID: 34081376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neurophysiological aftereffects of 10 Hz and 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation over bilateral sensorimotor cortex.
Lafleur LP; Klees-Themens G; Chouinard-Leclaire C; Larochelle-Brunet F; Tremblay S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Brain Res; 2020 Jan; 1727():146542. PubMed ID: 31712086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at individual alpha peak frequency (iAPF) on motor cortex excitability in young and elderly adults.
Fresnoza S; Christova M; Feil T; Gallasch E; Körner C; Zimmer U; Ischebeck A
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Oct; 236(10):2573-2588. PubMed ID: 29943239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phase of beta-frequency tACS over primary motor cortex modulates corticospinal excitability.
Schilberg L; Engelen T; Ten Oever S; Schuhmann T; de Gelder B; de Graaf TA; Sack AT
Cortex; 2018 Jun; 103():142-152. PubMed ID: 29635161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of 10 Hz and 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Automatic Motor Control.
Cappon D; D'Ostilio K; Garraux G; Rothwell J; Bisiacchi P
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):518-24. PubMed ID: 27038707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effects of 1 mA tACS and tRNS on Children/Adolescents and Adults: Investigating Age and Sensitivity to Sham Stimulation.
Splittgerber M; Suwelack JH; Kadish NE; Moliadze V
Neural Plast; 2020; 2020():8896423. PubMed ID: 32855633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standard intensities of transcranial alternating current stimulation over the motor cortex do not entrain corticospinal inputs to motor neurons.
Ibáñez J; Zicher B; Brown KE; Rocchi L; Casolo A; Del Vecchio A; Spampinato D; Vollette CA; Rothwell JC; Baker SN; Farina D
J Physiol; 2023 Aug; 601(15):3187-3199. PubMed ID: 35776944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.
Batsikadze G; Moliadze V; Paulus W; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
J Physiol; 2013 Apr; 591(7):1987-2000. PubMed ID: 23339180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Induce Cerebellum Plasticity? Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Electrophysiological Approach.
Naro A; Leo A; Russo M; Cannavò A; Milardi D; Bramanti P; Calabrò RS
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(3):388-395. PubMed ID: 26946958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Slow Oscillatory Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability Assessed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Geffen A; Bland N; Sale MV
Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():726604. PubMed ID: 34588969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of electrical stimulation of antagonist muscles for voluntary motor drive.
Sugawara K; Tanabe S; Suzuki T; Higashi T
Somatosens Mot Res; 2019 Jun; 36(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 31092131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of tRNS and 140 Hz tACS on motor cortex excitability seemingly dependent on sensitivity to sham stimulation.
Kortuem V; Kadish NE; Siniatchkin M; Moliadze V
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Nov; 237(11):2885-2895. PubMed ID: 31482197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of interhemispheric facilitation by short bursts of transcranial alternating current stimulation.
Calvert GHM; Carson RG
Neurosci Lett; 2023 Apr; 803():137190. PubMed ID: 36921664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The roles of caffeine and corticosteroids in modulating cortical excitability after paired associative stimulation (PAS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in caffeine-naïve and caffeine-adapted subjects.
Zulkifly MFM; Merkohitaj O; Paulus W; Brockmöller J
Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2021 May; 127():105201. PubMed ID: 33740589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing Gamma Oscillations Restores Primary Motor Cortex Plasticity in Parkinson's Disease.
Guerra A; Asci F; D'Onofrio V; Sveva V; Bologna M; Fabbrini G; Berardelli A; Suppa A
J Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 40(24):4788-4796. PubMed ID: 32430296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.
Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Meesen RLJ; Dechent P; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Apr; 41(6):1644-1666. PubMed ID: 31860160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
