158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34195239)
1. Acute Mechanical Performance of Magmaris vs. DESolve Bioresorbable Scaffolds in a Real-World Scenario.
Boeder NF; Dörr O; Koepp T; Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Elsässer A; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():696287. PubMed ID: 34195239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of strut thickness on acute mechanical performance: A comparison study using optical coherence tomography between DESolve 150 and DESolve 100.
Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Mattesini A; Elsässer A; Liebetrau C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Int J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 246():74-79. PubMed ID: 28579164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Plaque Composition, Morphology, and Burden on DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Expansion and Eccentricity - An Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis.
Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Elsässer A; Möllmann H; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Jun; 20(6):480-484. PubMed ID: 30638889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold for large coronary arteries: an OCT study of acute mechanical performance.
Boeder NF; Koepp T; Dörr O; Bauer T; Mattesini A; Elsässer A; Möllmann H; Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Ghanem A; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 220():706-10. PubMed ID: 27393853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absorb vs. DESolve: an optical coherence tomography comparison of acute mechanical performances.
Mattesini A; Boeder N; Valente S; Löblich K; Dörr O; Secco GG; Foin N; Caiazzo G; Ghione M; Gensini GF; Porto I; Di Mario C; Nef H
EuroIntervention; 2016 Aug; 12(5):e566-73. PubMed ID: 27497356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical presentation does not affect acute mechanical performance of the Novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold as assessed by optical coherence tomography.
Boeder NF; Dörr O; Gaderer R; Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Elsässer A; Hamm C; Nef HM
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej; 2021 Sep; 17(3):272-280. PubMed ID: 34819963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Overlapping implantation of bioresorbable novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study.
Blachutzik F; Boeder N; Wiebe J; Mattesini A; Dörr O; Most A; Bauer T; Tröbs M; Röther J; Schlundt C; Achenbach S; Hamm C; Nef H
Heart Vessels; 2017 Jul; 32(7):781-789. PubMed ID: 28004176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical properties of the drug-eluting bioresorbable magnesium scaffold compared with polymeric scaffolds and a permanent metallic drug-eluting stent.
Barkholt TØ; Webber B; Holm NR; Ormiston JA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Dec; 96(7):E674-E682. PubMed ID: 31710149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of non-compliant balloon postdilatation on magnesium-based bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Tröbs M; Marwan M; Weissner M; Nef H; Schlundt C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30196573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Post-dilatation after implantation of bioresorbable everolimus- and novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study of acute mechanical effects.
Blachutzik F; Boeder N; Wiebe J; Mattesini A; Dörr O; Most A; Bauer T; Röther J; Tröbs M; Schlundt C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 106(4):271-279. PubMed ID: 27757522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnesium versus poly-L-lactic acid bioresorbable scaffolds: in vivo optical coherence tomography comparison of mechanical performance.
Abellás-Sequeiros RA; Ocaranza-Sanchez R; Galvaõ-Braga C; Marques J; Gonzalez-Juanatey C
Arch Cardiol Mex; 2020; 90(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 31996867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Serial invasive imaging follow-up of the first clinical experience with the Magmaris magnesium bioresorbable scaffold.
Tovar Forero MN; van Zandvoort L; Masdjedi K; Diletti R; Wilschut J; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(2):226-231. PubMed ID: 31033171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: a comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance.
Mattesini A; Secco GG; Dall'Ara G; Ghione M; Rama-Merchan JC; Lupi A; Viceconte N; Lindsay AC; De Silva R; Foin N; Naganuma T; Valente S; Colombo A; Di Mario C
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):741-50. PubMed ID: 25060016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is high pressure postdilation safe in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds? Optical coherence tomography observations after noncompliant balloons inflated at more than 24 atmospheres.
Fabris E; Caiazzo G; Kilic ID; Serdoz R; Secco GG; Sinagra G; Lee R; Foin N; Di Mario C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):839-46. PubMed ID: 26370357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Serial Multimodality Imaging and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Novel DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System for the Treatment of Single De Novo Coronary Lesions.
Abizaid A; Costa RA; Schofer J; Ormiston J; Maeng M; Witzenbichler B; Botelho RV; Costa JR; Chamié D; Abizaid AS; Castro JP; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Verheye S
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(6):565-74. PubMed ID: 27013155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.
Verheye S; Ormiston JA; Stewart J; Webster M; Sanidas E; Costa R; Costa JR; Chamie D; Abizaid AS; Pinto I; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Abizaid A
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 24139932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro performance investigation of bioresorbable scaffolds - Standard tests for vascular stents and beyond.
Schmidt W; Behrens P; Brandt-Wunderlich C; Siewert S; Grabow N; Schmitz KP
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Sep; 17(6):375-83. PubMed ID: 27266902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Second-generation magnesium scaffold Magmaris: device design and preclinical evaluation in a porcine coronary artery model.
Waksman R; Zumstein P; Pritsch M; Wittchow E; Haude M; Lapointe-Corriveau C; Leclerc G; Joner M
EuroIntervention; 2017 Jul; 13(4):440-449. PubMed ID: 28262623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Acute Thrombogenicity for Metallic and Polymeric Bioabsorbable Scaffolds: Magmaris Versus Absorb in a Porcine Arteriovenous Shunt Model.
Waksman R; Lipinski MJ; Acampado E; Cheng Q; Adams L; Torii S; Gai J; Torguson R; Hellinga DM; Westman PC; Joner M; Zumstein P; Kolodgie FD; Virmani R
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28801538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of acute expansion of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic drug-eluting stents in different degrees of calcification: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
Ming Fam J; van Der Sijde JN; Karanasos A; Felix C; Diletti R; van Mieghem N; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Jan van Geuns R; Regar E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 89(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 27717119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
