BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34195837)

  • 1. NPSV: A simulation-driven approach to genotyping structural variants in whole-genome sequencing data.
    Linderman MD; Paudyal C; Shakeel M; Kelley W; Bashir A; Gelb BD
    Gigascience; 2021 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 34195837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SVJedi: genotyping structural variations with long reads.
    Lecompte L; Peterlongo P; Lavenier D; Lemaitre C
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Nov; 36(17):4568-4575. PubMed ID: 32437523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing.
    Kosugi S; Momozawa Y; Liu X; Terao C; Kubo M; Kamatani Y
    Genome Biol; 2019 Jun; 20(1):117. PubMed ID: 31159850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. nanotatoR: a tool for enhanced annotation of genomic structural variants.
    Bhattacharya S; Barseghyan H; Délot EC; Vilain E
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):10. PubMed ID: 33407088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotyping structural variants in pangenome graphs using the vg toolkit.
    Hickey G; Heller D; Monlong J; Sibbesen JA; Sirén J; Eizenga J; Dawson ET; Garrison E; Novak AM; Paten B
    Genome Biol; 2020 Feb; 21(1):35. PubMed ID: 32051000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
    Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. StrVCTVRE: A supervised learning method to predict the pathogenicity of human genome structural variants.
    Sharo AG; Hu Z; Sunyaev SR; Brenner SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Feb; 109(2):195-209. PubMed ID: 35032432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue: a deep-learning framework for structural variant discovery and genotyping.
    Popic V; Rohlicek C; Cunial F; Hajirasouliha I; Meleshko D; Garimella K; Maheshwari A
    Nat Methods; 2023 Apr; 20(4):559-568. PubMed ID: 36959322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PGG.SV: a whole-genome-sequencing-based structural variant resource and data analysis platform.
    Wang Y; Ling Y; Gong J; Zhao X; Zhou H; Xie B; Lou H; Zhuang X; Jin L; ; Fan S; Zhang G; Xu S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Jan; 51(D1):D1109-D1116. PubMed ID: 36243989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paragraph: a graph-based structural variant genotyper for short-read sequence data.
    Chen S; Krusche P; Dolzhenko E; Sherman RM; Petrovski R; Schlesinger F; Kirsche M; Bentley DR; Schatz MC; Sedlazeck FJ; Eberle MA
    Genome Biol; 2019 Dec; 20(1):291. PubMed ID: 31856913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SVExpress: identifying gene features altered recurrently in expression with nearby structural variant breakpoints.
    Zhang Y; Chen F; Creighton CJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):135. PubMed ID: 33743584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing structural variation in a personal genome-towards a human reference diploid genome.
    English AC; Salerno WJ; Hampton OA; Gonzaga-Jauregui C; Ambreth S; Ritter DI; Beck CR; Davis CF; Dahdouli M; Ma S; Carroll A; Veeraraghavan N; Bruestle J; Drees B; Hastie A; Lam ET; White S; Mishra P; Wang M; Han Y; Zhang F; Stankiewicz P; Wheeler DA; Reid JG; Muzny DM; Rogers J; Sabo A; Worley KC; Lupski JR; Boerwinkle E; Gibbs RA
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):286. PubMed ID: 25886820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of computational genotyping of structural variation for clinical diagnoses.
    Chander V; Gibbs RA; Sedlazeck FJ
    Gigascience; 2019 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 31494671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating nanopore sequencing data processing pipelines for structural variation identification.
    Zhou A; Lin T; Xing J
    Genome Biol; 2019 Nov; 20(1):237. PubMed ID: 31727126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of multiple algorithms to reliably detect structural variants in pears.
    Liu Y; Zhang M; Sun J; Chang W; Sun M; Zhang S; Wu J
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):61. PubMed ID: 31959124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expectations and blind spots for structural variation detection from long-read assemblies and short-read genome sequencing technologies.
    Zhao X; Collins RL; Lee WP; Weber AM; Jun Y; Zhu Q; Weisburd B; Huang Y; Audano PA; Wang H; Walker M; Lowther C; Fu J; ; Gerstein MB; Devine SE; Marschall T; Korbel JO; Eichler EE; Chaisson MJP; Lee C; Mills RE; Brand H; Talkowski ME
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 108(5):919-928. PubMed ID: 33789087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GraphTyper2 enables population-scale genotyping of structural variation using pangenome graphs.
    Eggertsson HP; Kristmundsdottir S; Beyter D; Jonsson H; Skuladottir A; Hardarson MT; Gudbjartsson DF; Stefansson K; Halldorsson BV; Melsted P
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5402. PubMed ID: 31776332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visualization tools for human structural variations identified by whole-genome sequencing.
    Yokoyama TT; Kasahara M
    J Hum Genet; 2020 Jan; 65(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 31666648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A graph clustering algorithm for detection and genotyping of structural variants from long reads.
    Gaitán N; Duitama J
    Gigascience; 2024 Jan; 13():. PubMed ID: 38206589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comprehensive evaluation of structural variant genotyping methods based on long-read sequencing data.
    Duan X; Pan M; Fan S
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):324. PubMed ID: 35461238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.