These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34196456)

  • 1. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M; Ding Q; Li L; Yang G; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Zhang L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Accuracy of intercuspal occlusion in 3D reconstruction with the dental articulator position method].
    Li LL; Zhao YJ; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):138-143. PubMed ID: 32071477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Goicoechea N; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of Dynamic Virtual Articulation: Trueness and Precision.
    Hsu MR; Driscoll CF; Romberg E; Masri R
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):436-443. PubMed ID: 30737975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical application of a prefabricated interocclusal recording cap for making interocclusal records of implant-supported fixed prostheses].
    Ding Q; Pu TT; He MZ; Wang SM; Li WJ; Zhang L; Liu JZ; Tong D; Zhou YS
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 56(12):1205-1210. PubMed ID: 34915654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator.
    Úry E; Fornai C; Weber GW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):305-313. PubMed ID: 31227241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining the requirements, section quantity, and dimension of the virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Arias A; Brizuela A; Garikano X; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 26386482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Method and accuracy of determining the jaw position of repositioning splint with the aid of digital technique].
    Fang SB; Yang GJ; Kang YF; Sun YC; Xie QF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 33550339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of eccentric tooth contact on a semi-adjustable articulator by using an occlusal analysis system.
    Jeong MY; Kim MJ; Lim YJ; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 35246320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study based on the mandibular movement track and the movement parameters of the virtual articulator in simulating occlusal adjustment.
    Ma L; Chao J; Liu F; Mei J; Shen J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 41(3):254-259. PubMed ID: 37277790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Maximum Intercuspal Contacts of Articulated Casts and Virtual Casts Requiring Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Arslan Y; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S; Kökdoğan Boyacı B; Aydın C
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):594-598. PubMed ID: 26848940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occlusal Assessment of Zirconia Crowns Designed with the Digital Articulator and Traditional Methods.
    Zhang R; Sun Y; Liu Y; Ding Q; Zhang L; Xie Q
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 33570515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):435-440. PubMed ID: 36349566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A digital approach to the evaluation of mandibular position by using a virtual articulator.
    Park JH; Lee GH; Moon DN; Kim JC; Park M; Lee KM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):849-853. PubMed ID: 32624222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trueness evaluation of three intraoral scanners for the recording of maximal intercuspal position.
    Wang S; Zhou Z; Yuan Q; Yue L; Yang S
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Apr; 42(2):227-233. PubMed ID: 38597082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.