These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34197096)
1. Prediction of the Drug-Target Binding Kinetics for Flexible Proteins by Comparative Binding Energy Analysis. Nunes-Alves A; Ormersbach F; Wade RC J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jul; 61(7):3708-3721. PubMed ID: 34197096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Protocol to Use Comparative Binding Energy Analysis to Estimate Drug-Target Residence Time. Ganotra GK; Nunes-Alves A; Wade RC Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():171-186. PubMed ID: 33759127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of Drug-Target Binding Kinetics by Comparative Binding Energy Analysis. Ganotra GK; Wade RC ACS Med Chem Lett; 2018 Nov; 9(11):1134-1139. PubMed ID: 30429958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational modeling approaches to quantitative structure-binding kinetics relationships in drug discovery. De Benedetti PG; Fanelli F Drug Discov Today; 2018 Jul; 23(7):1396-1406. PubMed ID: 29574212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Higher Accuracy Achieved for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose Prediction by Elastic Network Model-Based Ensemble Docking. Wang A; Zhang Y; Chu H; Liao C; Zhang Z; Li G J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):2939-2950. PubMed ID: 32383873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Silico Prediction of the Dissociation Rate Constants of Small Chemical Ligands by 3D-Grid-Based VolSurf Method. Huang S; Chen L; Mei H; Zhang D; Shi T; Kuang Z; Heng Y; Xu L; Pan X Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Apr; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 32252223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transient States and Barriers from Molecular Simulations and the Milestoning Theory: Kinetics in Ligand-Protein Recognition and Compound Design. Tang Z; Chen SH; Chang CA J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1882-1895. PubMed ID: 32031801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Plasticity of the Binding Site of Renin: Optimized Selection of Protein Structures for Ensemble Docking. Strecker C; Meyer B J Chem Inf Model; 2018 May; 58(5):1121-1131. PubMed ID: 29683661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Receptor-based 3D QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands--merging the accuracy of receptor-based alignments with the computational efficiency of ligand-based methods. Sippl W J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2000 Aug; 14(6):559-72. PubMed ID: 10921772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Huang SY; Zou X Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public Data Set of Protein-Ligand Dissociation Kinetic Constants for Quantitative Structure-Kinetics Relationship Studies. Liu H; Su M; Lin HX; Wang R; Li Y ACS Omega; 2022 Jun; 7(22):18985-18996. PubMed ID: 35694511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Poses via a Combination of Induced Fit Docking and Metadynamics Simulations. Clark AJ; Tiwary P; Borrelli K; Feng S; Miller EB; Abel R; Friesner RA; Berne BJ J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jun; 12(6):2990-8. PubMed ID: 27145262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]