These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34197096)

  • 1. Prediction of the Drug-Target Binding Kinetics for Flexible Proteins by Comparative Binding Energy Analysis.
    Nunes-Alves A; Ormersbach F; Wade RC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jul; 61(7):3708-3721. PubMed ID: 34197096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Protocol to Use Comparative Binding Energy Analysis to Estimate Drug-Target Residence Time.
    Ganotra GK; Nunes-Alves A; Wade RC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():171-186. PubMed ID: 33759127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of Drug-Target Binding Kinetics by Comparative Binding Energy Analysis.
    Ganotra GK; Wade RC
    ACS Med Chem Lett; 2018 Nov; 9(11):1134-1139. PubMed ID: 30429958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational modeling approaches to quantitative structure-binding kinetics relationships in drug discovery.
    De Benedetti PG; Fanelli F
    Drug Discov Today; 2018 Jul; 23(7):1396-1406. PubMed ID: 29574212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Higher Accuracy Achieved for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose Prediction by Elastic Network Model-Based Ensemble Docking.
    Wang A; Zhang Y; Chu H; Liao C; Zhang Z; Li G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):2939-2950. PubMed ID: 32383873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In Silico Prediction of the Dissociation Rate Constants of Small Chemical Ligands by 3D-Grid-Based VolSurf Method.
    Huang S; Chen L; Mei H; Zhang D; Shi T; Kuang Z; Heng Y; Xu L; Pan X
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Apr; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 32252223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transient States and Barriers from Molecular Simulations and the Milestoning Theory: Kinetics in Ligand-Protein Recognition and Compound Design.
    Tang Z; Chen SH; Chang CA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1882-1895. PubMed ID: 32031801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plasticity of the Binding Site of Renin: Optimized Selection of Protein Structures for Ensemble Docking.
    Strecker C; Meyer B
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 May; 58(5):1121-1131. PubMed ID: 29683661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Receptor-based 3D QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands--merging the accuracy of receptor-based alignments with the computational efficiency of ligand-based methods.
    Sippl W
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2000 Aug; 14(6):559-72. PubMed ID: 10921772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public Data Set of Protein-Ligand Dissociation Kinetic Constants for Quantitative Structure-Kinetics Relationship Studies.
    Liu H; Su M; Lin HX; Wang R; Li Y
    ACS Omega; 2022 Jun; 7(22):18985-18996. PubMed ID: 35694511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Poses via a Combination of Induced Fit Docking and Metadynamics Simulations.
    Clark AJ; Tiwary P; Borrelli K; Feng S; Miller EB; Abel R; Friesner RA; Berne BJ
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jun; 12(6):2990-8. PubMed ID: 27145262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Receptor-ligand docking simulation for membrane proteins].
    Hirokawa T
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2007 Jan; 127(1):123-31. PubMed ID: 17202792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine Learning Analysis of Ï„RAMD Trajectories to Decipher Molecular Determinants of Drug-Target Residence Times.
    Kokh DB; Kaufmann T; Kister B; Wade RC
    Front Mol Biosci; 2019; 6():36. PubMed ID: 31179286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ranking of Ligand Binding Kinetics Using a Weighted Ensemble Approach and Comparison with a Multiscale Milestoning Approach.
    Ahn SH; Jagger BR; Amaro RE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5340-5352. PubMed ID: 32315175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advances in Docking.
    Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of protein-ligand interactions by NMR.
    Furukawa A; Konuma T; Yanaka S; Sugase K
    Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc; 2016 Aug; 96():47-57. PubMed ID: 27573180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.