BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3419825)

  • 1. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the presence of a central fusion lock effect on fixation disparity curve parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Mirzaeian M; Hashemi H; Narooie-Noori F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Sardari S; Ostadimoghaddam H; Doostdar A; Khabazkhoob M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jul; 104(5):617-624. PubMed ID: 33751916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
    Karania R; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.
    Brownlee GA; Goss DA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3403890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of fixation disparity curve variables measured with the Sheedy Disparometer and the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card.
    Goss DA; Patel J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):580-8. PubMed ID: 8539027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement of Fixation Disparity Curve between Two Different Instruments.
    Hashemi H; Mirzaeian M; Narooie F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Ostadimoghaddam H; Sardari S; Khabazkhoob M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jun; 98(6):629-635. PubMed ID: 34081653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of illumination and foveal fusion lock on clinical fixation disparity measurements with the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Wildsoet CF; Cameron KD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 4022649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixation disparity and near visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Abd-Manan F; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jan; 15(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 7724221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of fixation disparity measured by saladin card and disparometer.
    Frantz KA; Elston P; Michalik E; Templeman CD; Zoltoski RK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 88(6):E733-41. PubMed ID: 21423065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?
    Parmar KR; Dickinson C; Evans BJW
    J Optom; 2019; 12(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 31501055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability of Associated Phoria Tests.
    Alhassan M; Hovis JK; Chou RB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):900-7. PubMed ID: 26099058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of fixation disparity curve with the modified near Mallett unit and the wesson fixation disparity card in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta AA; Ehsani M; Kundart J
    Strabismus; 2012 Dec; 20(4):166-74. PubMed ID: 23211142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Do prism corrections according to H.-J. Haase affect ocular prevalence?].
    Schroth V; Jaschinski W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 17260317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of prolonged dissociation on the subjective measurement of near heterophoria.
    Rosenfield M; Chun TW; Fischer SE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Nov; 17(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 9666921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Wesson and modified Sheedy fixation disparity tests. Do fixation disparity measures relate to normal binocular status?
    van Haeringen R; McClurg P; Cameron KD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 3627800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of two fixation disparity targets.
    Griffin JR; Shultz WE; Vansuch JJ
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1978 Aug; 49(8):905-7. PubMed ID: 701715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The symptomatic patient with normal phorias at distance and near: what tests detect a binocular vision problem?
    Gall R; Wick B
    Optometry; 2003 May; 74(5):309-22. PubMed ID: 12795318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heterophoria and fixation disparity: a review.
    Kommerell G; Gerling J; Ball M; de Paz H; Bach M
    Strabismus; 2000 Jun; 8(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10980694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between fixation disparity curves and symptoms in monofixators.
    London R; Wick B
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Nov; 53(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7175062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurements of objective and subjective fixation disparity with and without a central fusion stimulus.
    Brautaset RL; Jennings JA
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Feb; 12(2):MT1-4. PubMed ID: 16449958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.